Showing posts with label Chris Roycroft-Davis. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Chris Roycroft-Davis. Show all posts

Wednesday, 31 January 2018

Plotting Tories must put needs of our country first, says CHRIS ROYCROFT-DAVIS

IT’S a fair bet that when Theresa May sat back and relaxed on her 12-hour flight to China yesterday, she wasn’t listening on her headphones to the Bob Marley song Who The Cap Fit.

tm1GETTY
Theresa May needs support of the Cabinet
Shame, she would have marvelled at the accuracy of his lyrics… Man to man is so unjust, children, Ya don’t know who to trust.
Your worst enemy could be your best friend, And your best friend your worst enemy.
Doesn’t that sum up perfectly the parlous state of the Conservative Party as it revels in yet another round of blue-on-blue bloodletting, Brexit versus Remoaners, winners versus losers?
When will Tory MPs grow up and start putting the needs of the country before the urge to rub out their party leader – and with her their own party?
We’ve all known for a long time that while those whom we elect may be intellectually sharp (I exclude Jeremy Corbyn from that category, of course), when it comes to common sense they are sadly lacking. 
Their clamour for Mrs May to be replaced as prime minister is based on a curious but false assumption – that the voters would welcome yet another round of political shenanigans, that business would applaud the prospect of yet more uncertainty and that Brussels would give us an easier time over Brexit if someone else were in Number 10.
You should always be careful what you wish for. What if that someone else were not Boris Johnson, Philip Hammond or Amber Rudd (to name but three of the Tories who mistakenly consider they’d make a better job of it)?
What if it were Marxist Corbyn, with his henchman John McDonnell as Chancellor and his juvenile revolutionaries in the Cabinet? Whatever some Tory MPs say about Mrs May needing to be “a lion not a tortoise” – a cruel and unjustified barb from George Osborne’s former lackey Robert Halfon – surely even the dimmest among them can see that kicking her out could hand Corbyn power.
Not content with destroying their party, do they really want to destroy the country too? Many of them have an axe to grind, however.
A well-sharpened axe at that. Nicky Morgan has never forgiven Mrs May for giving her the boot because she was a useless Education Secretary and Anna Soubry delights in moaning to anyone who will listen that the referendum result was “a terrible, terrible mistake”. 

Theresa May visits university on her three-day China visit

 
tm2GETTY
What if 'someone else' were Jeremy Corbyn?
She believes she knows better than 17.4 million Brexit voters. Others are dyed-in-the-wool Europhiles who would love nothing more than to throw a gigantic spanner in the works and bring Brexit to a grinding halt.
Chancellor Philip Hammond doesn’t even try to disguise his animosity towards Brexit and were it not for the fact Mrs May has such a wafer-thin majority, backed by the DUP, he would surely have been sacked months ago.
Mrs May is not in the mould of a Churchill or a Thatcher, and some may wish she were more visionary and inspirational.
But one thing is true – if she’s not the best prime minister we’ve ever had, she’s the best one we’ve got right now and she is better than any alternative that could be dreamt up.
It is the duty of Conservative MPs to give her their fullest support. Just as Clement Attlee put aside political differences to give Winston Churchill his full backing during this country’s darkest hour, so today’s crop of political pygmies should do the same.
They insist that it would be much easier for Mrs May to attract their support were she able to galvanise them – and the nation – with a stirring speech.
She needs to set out with brilliance and coherence her vision of Britain after Brexit and her strategy for achieving what so many of us voted for.
If only she were an orator like Tony Blair. If only she were a smooth operator like David Cameron. If only, if only… If only they would wake up and see that what this country needs more than ever is someone who is not a slippery snakeoil salesman.
Someone who says what they mean, albeit it in a somewhat stilted manner, who is true to their word. Someone honest. Someone with principles. Someone who doesn’t cut and run when the going gets tough. That someone is Theresa May.
How can so many Tory MPs be so blind that they cannot see that? Or is the truth that they do not want to see it? Have their personal grudges, their lust for power, distorted their judgment and turned them all into Brutus, the ally only too willing to plunge in the dagger?
tm3GETTY
Mrs May is better than any alternative that could be dreamt up
If 48 Tory MPs write to the chairman of the backbench 1922 committee calling for Mrs May to resign, he is obliged to ask her to stand down and to hold a leadership election.
If anything near that number genuinely exists, who would those 48 treacherous saps see as being the perfect leader of this country, the person who would stand up to the EU and get a formidable deal from Merkel and Macron, who would give Corbyn a well-deserved bloody nose, who would unite not just the party but the nation?
The candidates whose names are being bandied around Westminster are scary. The very idea that any of them is suitable for the highest office is laughable. Except it’s no joke.
No one is laughing. This is deadly serious. Our future is at stake. 

Saturday, 5 August 2017

Britain needs a Chancellor who believes in Brexit - says CHRIS ROYCROFT-DAVIS

NO discussion on the grubby state of politics today would be complete without a quote from Marx.

Philip HammondPA
Philip Hammond has been dubbed ‘Flip-Flop Phil’
Not Karl Marx, father of communism, but Groucho Marx, father of satirical one-liners.
He summed up the way too many politicians think when he declared: “Those are my principles and if you don’t like them... well, I have others.”
Few people who have climbed the slippery pole of politics are more adept at facing two ways at once than the man who unfortunately occupies the second-highest office in the land, Chancellor  
Business guru John Longworth calls him “” for changing his mind on key issues concerning the EU and the economy and demands he be sacked because of the damaging effect his anti-Brexit attitude is having.
There is only one thing on which Hammond’s mind is firmly made up.
He will never be shifted from his conviction that the  is the greatest thing since sliced bread and that leaving will cause Britain to self-destruct.
He will never flip-flop on his adulation of the European project, however undemocratic and inward-looking it is.
He is an arch Remainer in a Cabinet that is tasked with making sure that Leave means Leave.
Seldom has there been a more glaring example of the wrong man being in the wrong job at the wrong time.
As Longworth rightly says, at this crucially important time – when we need grit and determination to build a new Jerusalem away from the clutches of the arthritic EU – we are stuck with a Chancellor who desires the opposite of what most of the country wants.
Hammond pays lip service to the views expressed by 17.4million voters in the referendum but in his heart he believes they didn’t know what they were doing.
So therefore it is entirely proper – indeed, his duty – to ignore their wishes and construct a dodgy deal with Brussels that will see us leave the EU in name only.
A careful analysis of his pronouncements on  makes this very clear.
Although some of his words are impenetrably turgid – one Cabinet colleague says Hammond “argues like an accountant seeing the risk of everything” – the flip-flops shine through.
Even his basic stance immediately after the referendum rang alarm bells.
Having backed Remain and lost, he floated a smokescreen by saying, “No ifs, no buts, no second referendums. We are leaving the European Union.”
With Hammond there is always a but.
So in the next breath he declared: “But it is equally clear to me that the British people did not vote on June 23 to become poorer, or less secure.”
He is right of course – we voted to become independent, sovereign and free.
Most of us accepted there might be short-term pain but we knew that if the Government put its heart and soul into it, Brexit would transform this country and be the spark that ignited a golden future.
Hammond’s trouble is that like his predecessor, , he has no soul.
At every turn everything is painted black in the hope that Brexit can be undermined and if not reversed, then at least watered down to the point where it will be like political homeopathy – one part innovation to a million parts stagnation.
Hammond has vowed he will take whatever steps are necessary to protect the economy, jobs and living standards.
By that he means change nothing, kow-tow to the EU, keep taxing us more and more.
One of the greatest opportunities Brexit presents is to regain control of our economy.
Freed from the diktats of the socialist superstate across the Channel we can stimulate growth and foreign investment by cutting taxes and scrapping red tape to entice wealth creators.
By competing with high-tax, high-regulation Europe we can make Britain an even greater place to do business.
You would be excused for thinking that approach would be music to a Chancellor’s ears.
At the start of the year he certainly gave that distinct impression in an interview with a German newspaper.
His gung-ho approach to competing and trading with the world was refreshing; he even went so far as to say: “You can be sure we will do whatever we have to do. The British people are not going to lie down... we will change our model, and we will come back and we will be competitively engaged.”
It was all nonsense, of course. Last month Flip-Flop Phil assured a French paper that Britain will not become a Singapore-style tax haven.
He would not be cutting corporation tax nor tearing up business regulations.
He said: “I often hear it said that the UK is considering participating in unfair competition in regulation and tax. That is neither our plan nor our vision for the future.”
To which the only question can be: Why the hell not?
Hammond’s answer is telling: “I would expect us to remain a country with a social, economic and cultural model that is recognisably European.”
What the country voted for was a social, economic and cultural model that was recognisably British.
If Hammond is too arrogant to understand that then the Prime Minister must replace him right away with someone who does get it – before Hammond does any more damage to our prospects.
Groucho Marx had another saying that perfectly sums up Hammond’s situation: “Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it everywhere, diagnosing it incorrectly, and applying the wrong remedies.”
He has to go. Soon.
http://www.express.co.uk/comment/expresscomment/837218/Brexit-Britain-needs-chancellor-Philip-Hammond-who-believes-Chris-Roycroft-Davis