Showing posts with label Ruth Davidson. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ruth Davidson. Show all posts

Wednesday, 15 January 2020

Why SNP have NO mandate for second referendum exposed - Ruth Davidson's brilliant point on

RUTH DAVIDSON brilliantly explained why the SNP have “no mandate and no reason” to hold a second independence referendum if Scotland is taken out of the EU against its will, in a throwback interview.

ctp_video, snp, snp news, scotland, scotland independence, second referendum, indyref2, ruth davidson, boris johnson, boris johnon news, nicola sturge
How Ruth Davidson brilliantly explained why SNP have NO mandate for second referendum (Image: GETTY)

At the end of last month, Scottish First Minister Nicola Sturgeon sent documents to Prime Minister Boris Johnson, outlining her case for Indyref2, arguing that she now has an “unarguable” mandate after the SNP won 48 of Scotland’s 59 seats in the December 12 general election. However, yesterday, the Government formally rejected her call. Mr Johnson said a referendum would "continue the political stagnation Scotland has seen for the past decade", and noted that the First Minister had previously pledged that the 2014 referendum would be a "once in a generation" vote.

In response, Ms Sturgeon tweeted that the Tories were attempting to "deny democracy" and campaigners are now aiming to raise £50,000 to launch a legal challenge against the Government.
As fears the union could unravel intensify, a 2016 report by The Telegraph has resurfaced, in which former Scottish Conservative leader Ruth Davidson brilliantly explains why the SNP have no mandate and no reason to hold a second independence referendum.
Rejecting Ms Sturgeon's claim that Brexit would justify another vote on the break-up of Britain, Ms Davidson said: "There is no mandate for the SNP to say that Brexit is the trigger.

"There is no reason.
“She says this is a material change, but if you flip that the other way, if Scotland voted Yes in 2014, would I have been able to say let’s have another referendum because the oil price tanked, because that’s a material change?
“No.
"There was an agreement that was signed by two governments that said we will respect the result of the referendum.
"To say they are going to re-run a second one is not respecting that.”
Willie Rennie, the Scottish Liberal Democrat leader, also told The Telegraph at the time that the last thing Scotland needed was a First Minister who spent “the next five years campaigning for independence and poring over the runes to decide what constitutes a change in circumstances while public services decline".
He added: “We need a transformational investment to make our education system the best in the world again.
"A step change in the way we treat mental health and urgent action to meet our green targets.”
Mr Rennie's claims were echoed by Mr Johnson his morning during Prime Minister's Questions.
After being accused of being a "democracy denier" by the SNP's Westminster leader Ian Blackford, Mr Johnson rebuked: "Scotland under the SNP is the highest-taxed part of the UK.
"The deficit is six times the UK average.
"Maths and science in schools are actually going down in the rankings unlike any other part of the United Kingdom.
"That is not the fault of the pupils of Scotland, it's the fault of the SNP Government who are not giving them the chances they deserve because they are focused on breaking up the union.
"Change the record."

Saturday, 6 July 2019

A new tune: Boris Johnson on his plan to unite Britain

Also: On Brexit, preparing for no deal now and how to beat Jeremy Corbyn


6 July 2019
9:00 AM


‘I’m going to stick ruthlessly to script,’ says Boris Johnson. ‘This is not the stage of the campaign when you innovate.’ He’s right to worry about the timing. The new Tory leader won’t be chosen for just over two weeks but the ballot papers go out this weekend. Boris is the odds-on favourite. This is the most important week of the campaign and he’s determined to come across as a serious, game-changing leader, not the loveable yet unreliable joker.
The old Boris would mess up his hair before going on television. Today, when we meet in his House of Commons office, he quickly puts on a jacket — as if getting dressed for a job interview. He’s making a sales pitch. ‘Years of watching this thing decay, three years of drift and dither, have filled me with not just an understanding of government but also a very clear picture of how to get it done,’ he says. ‘My determination burns with a magnesium brightness to get it done and to deliver.’
The ‘it’, of course, is Brexit, which he defines as leaving the EU on 31 October, come what may. But how? He has been accused of being light on detail — something Jeremy Hunt, his opponent, has sought to exploit by setting out a detailed no-deal plan. Boris says he also has a plan and offers four points. The first: to legislate to protect the rights of all EU citizens living in the UK. Next, to compensate the farmers who might be affected by a no-deal Brexit. Thirdly, to prepare small businesses who export to the EU to get ready for a new regime of heavier paperwork should no deal happen. Finally, restore power-sharing to Northern Ireland — something that is, he admits, easier said than done.
If there is a no-deal Brexit, he says, the UK will be ready. ‘And don’t forget that we will also have £39 billion, notionally, with which to lubricate any problems that remain. That’s quite a substantial sum.’ So the UK has everything needed, he says, to escape the flytrap of the EU by November. ‘Talking to people in this country, even talking to businesses, people feel that they have had enough of being told they can’t do things. They have had enough of being told this country is not up to it. They want to get on and do it. That will be our salvation.’
The salvation of the Tory party, he says, will be focusing on the wider problems exposed by Brexit. “Loads of people in parts of rural Britain or urban, Oppidan Britain found a sense that their lives and their futures weren’t as important,” he says. “That is totally wrong. There is a big, big opportunity to bring the country together.” So he’s the candidate for Oppidan Britain. But what on earth does that mean?
The answer lies in Eton, where Boris was a King’s scholar. His school fees would have been a fraction of those for most other pupils, known as Oppidans. There was always rivalry between the two: in school, and after. A pitch for the ‘left behind’ Oppidans might help bring the Tories back together, reaching out to David Cameron and Rory Stewart (both Oppidans).
But what about the rest of the party? ‘I’ve been talking to a lot of colleagues, as you can imagine, from all wings of the party in the last few days,’ he continues. ‘I do believe that common sense is breaking out.’
The biggest dividing line among Tories has been the idea of a no-deal Brexit. Jeremy Hunt has said he’ll decide in September whether to pursue it — which, to Boris, would be way too late. ‘It seems to me to be the height of folly,’ he says. ‘Why wait? If we are going to be carrying out negotiations throughout August and September, which of course we will be, it seems folly not to be preparing for no deal at the same time.’ Delay, he says, ‘totally robs the UK of conviction during the negotiations’. Boris believes that by making it clear that the country is prepared to walk away, Britain will change the dynamics of the negotiation and lead to the EU making concessions.
He says that Britain was ready to leave the EU without a deal on 29 March but the government lost its nerve. ‘The greyhounds were pretty much straining in the slips as we came up to the end of March. People were ready. The machine was poised, then everybody was stood down. The Grand Old Duke of York marched her troops down again. As a result there was a sagging in the level of readiness.’ A mistake that he says he won’t repeat. ‘We have to be ready to come out and we have to prepare now.’
One of the most striking things about Boris is how utterly convinced he is that preparing for no deal will prevent it. He tells us with a pained look on his face that ‘I do not want a disruptive or disorderly no deal — everybody gets that and I’ve said that many, many times. I don’t want us to crash out but we must prepare for that eventuality and start preparing now and not wait a couple of months.’
Only Brexit, he says, can heal the divides of Brexit. ‘We haven’t allayed the divisions, we haven’t made them better. We haven’t healed the rift by delay. We’ve made it worse,’ he says. ‘The wrangling has intensified because of the uncertainty over the direction of travel. Like any, erm … domestic.’ Perhaps understandably, given recent events, he abandons the analogy.
He deals with questions about his private life — and any ‘domestic’ — by stonewalling. Interviewers have now stopped asking. He has replaced his usual tactic of responding to questions with long, digressive answers with making short points, even one-word replies. Are there any circumstances where he’d build a wall at the Irish border? ‘No.’ So the only way there would ever be hard infrastructure on that border is if the Irish government builds it? ‘Correct. Correct.’ Could he not make more of that, given how worried many are about a hard border? ‘Well, I am. There can be no more powerful clarion, there could be no more vivid advertisement of that than through the pages of The Spectator!’
In Boris Johnson’s mind, the question of how the UK and the EU solve the Irish border question is ‘going to be the shape of the answer to the entire problem of how the UK can come out of the EU while retaining frictionless trade’. He says that the Irish border is ‘simply in microcosm, the problem that will be expressed at every UK/EU frontier when we come out … what is essential is that we are not locked in the customs union, not in the single market’. He then adds with glee that ‘the current withdrawal agreement is, as they say in Brussels, “caduque”’ — null and void.
The biggest policy misfire of his campaign so far came when he used his Daily Telegraph column to pitch a plan to cut tax for higher earners by raising the 40p threshold from £50k to £80k. For this he was attacked by Ruth Davidson, the Scottish Tory leader, who said the low-paid should be first in line for a tax cut. He says he isn’t in the mood to be ‘dragged into a conversation about the top rate’ again but he does voice surprise at the backlash. ‘I’m amazed this should be a taboo subject in the Conservative party.’
Davidson’s reservations over Johnson go further than tax cuts. Scottish Conservatives worry that he could prove a flop with voters north of the border. For his part, Johnson remains optimistic. He dismisses a recent poll that gave him a -37 approval rating in Scotland – behind Nigel Farage – on the grounds that he was greeted warmly when he visited Aberdeen. ‘Actually I went up to Scotland quite recently and found I had an extremely warm reception wherever I went,’ he says. ‘I’m very suspicious of this data.’
He hopes to help Davidson by delivering a Brexit which, he says, will strengthen the union by making separation less attractive. ‘The SNP, post-Brexit, will be launched on an entirely quixotic campaign to lead Scotland back into the EU, into the euro, into the Schengen group, under the whole panoply of EU law. The SNP will be logically committed, post-Brexit, to giving up control of Scottish fish again. I really can’t see that as a winning electoral proposition in Scotland.’
With Brexit done, he says, he’d then seek to unite the party and the country with his version of liberal Conservatism. ‘Once we’re over the line, clarity will descend,’ he says. ‘We’ll be able to get on with the fantastic agenda of bringing the country together with a programme of what I call modern Conservatism, what we used to call “One Nation Conservatism”. It is very, very simple and is based on the idea that a dynamic free-market economy is indispensable for delivering fantastic public services. And that fantastic public services are indispensable for a dynamic market economy. It is not a difficult sell.’
He is now promising to cut National Insurance for the low-paid and raise the minimum wage. When asked why food bank use is rising, he returns to the theme. ‘The answer is we need higher pay. If I am lucky enough to be prime minister, I want to bring the country together. Look at what we did in London — it remained the powerhouse of the UK economy, it remained the most productive region in Europe. But what also happened was people at the bottom end got richer faster. Their life expectancy increased, as a proportion more than those at the top. That’s what we should be doing. You can have both.’
‘We have to do three things: deliver Brexit, unite the party, unite the country and defeat Corbyn. And I think I am best placed to do all three.’ He says that being an election winner is his ‘true selling point’ and that as prime minister he would be able to make the case for Conservatism. ‘For three years, we have failed to get across why we believe in free markets,’ he says. ‘We have failed to articulate the case for enterprise. In fact, it’s been a massive missed opportunity: we’ve failed to make the case for business. That is the opportunity that we have now — to show the British public what they instinctively understand.’
‘We need to sell that again to the British people, then wallop Corbyn for six. As I never tire of telling everyone — and I must get this key point over the line — the last time I had to fight an emanation of the London Labour left, I beat him when our party was 17 points behind.’
So the three things that we have to do are to deliver Brexit, unite the party, unite the country and defeat Corbyn. I think I am best placed to do all three.’ Or, in this list, four – but who’s counting?
But Boris’s problem is that, now, a great many people are counting as well as costing his various promises and digging up comments he made as a journalist. Often in articles he wrote for this magazine, which he edited from 1999-2005. Rather than defend each article, Boris has responded by asking for forgiveness for anything that he has written before he came to office that might have caused offence. A departure from the last article he wrote as editor of this magazine was to rail against apology. “‘The Spectator surrenders to no one,” he said. “The Spectator is always right’. Why has he changed his tune?
‘I wasn’t entirely consistent I must say during my time at The Spectator,’ he sighs. ‘I remember I wrote a cover story in which I apologised to various bollards in Liverpool.’
As Prime Minister, Boris wants to be the enemy of the nanny state. He wants to review puritanical ‘sin’ taxes, such as the sugar tax. What about health regulations that stop many restaurants serving rare burgers? ‘Can you not order rare hamburgers now?’ he asks. ‘Why the hell not? That’s ludicrous, that can’t be true.’ This burning injustice would be swiftly addressed.
Despite his smart jacket and serious demeanour, there are still reminders of the old Boris scattered all over his office. A model bus sits behind him on the desk, an Olympic flag hangs on the wall, and a bust of Pericles lies on the floor. They all represent his qualifications for the job: his rhetorical talents, his record in London, his ability to inspire. There aren’t many mementos of his stint as Foreign Secretary.
Boris the politician is again familiarising himself with the constraints that come with high office. His beloved bike has gone — ‘banned,’ he says, by his team. His security detail could soon be back to exercising alongside him. ‘God they were patient to run at the pace of a very elderly man,’ he says.
He’s not looking forwarding to returning to ministerial cars, as he doesn’t like the air con: ‘You can’t open the windows because they are all armour-plated.’ Sensing that he has drifted off message, he quickly declares that this hardship would be ‘a small price to pay for the opportunity to deliver Brexit by 31 October, to unite our party and our country and to get ready to defeat Jeremy Corbyn.’
SPECTATOR.CO.UK/PODCAST
Katy Balls talks to James Forsyth and Andrew Gimson about Boris Johnson.

Tuesday, 3 October 2017

British Politics Heads to Radical Places

For a generation, aspiring British prime ministers on both sides of the aisle sought power by attempting to take the middle ground. It worked for Tony Blair, David Cameron and even Margaret Thatcher. Then Brexit happened.
  • Rees-Mogg the biggest draw as Tory conference leans to right
  • Move away from middle ground mirrors Labour socialist revival



Jacob Rees-Mogg speaks to attendees and delegates on day two of the Conservative Party
Conference in Manchester, England, on Oct. 2.
 Photographer: Carl Court/Getty Images

The political rule book has been torn up in the wake of last year’s vote to quit the European Union and the back-to-back party conferences reflect a rush to the ideological fringes. Under its leader Jeremy Corbyn, Labour has soared in popularity by offering hard-line socialism.
Theresa May
Photographer: Matthew Lloyd/Bloomberg



At the Conservative gathering in the city of Manchester, the disenchantment for the party’s leadership is palpable, with members flocking to side meetings extolling the virtues of unfettered free-market capitalism and a hard Brexit. The star attraction is Jacob Rees-Mogg, a Latin-speaking traditionalist against gay marriage and abortion.
“He is quite old fashioned, but at least he isn’t a Liberal Democrat in a blue tie,” said Ross Atkinson, 24, a pub chef who was queuing all afternoon to see his hero. Pulling his shirt apart to reveal his ‘Moggmentum’ tattoo, he added “Theresa May just doesn’t come across as a proud Tory,”
The mood at the Tory conference is subdued after years in which they were either preparing for government or enjoying the fruits of power. While last year there was an atmosphere of euphoria following the vote to leave the EU, this year is a more reflective affair dominated by Boris Johnson’s antics and recriminations after May’s disastrous election performance.




Theresa May Under Pressure to Sack Johnson
Simon French, chief economist at Panmure Gordon, discusses the future of Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson.
“Daybreak: Europe." (Source: Bloomberg)

“There is a sense that both parties are pursuing a more radical agenda,” said Jane Green, professor of politics at Manchester University. “If you are a voter who sees Brexit as a radical, risky proposition, and who sees Corbyn as a radical, risky proposition, it’s hard to see what the choice is for stability.”

Dirty Word

“It is not terribly popular now to call yourself a centrist,” said Ruth Davidson who, despite being a moderate, is one of the darlings at the conference. She told delegates at a packed side event that holding the middle ground had driven the Tory comeback in Scotland.
While May has announced a freeze in university tuition fees and offered pay rises to some public sector employees in an attempt to win back voters from Corbyn’s anti-austerity party, Tory activists are warming to Rees-Mogg’s commitment to spending cuts and austerity.
As a crowd of hundreds cheered Rees-Mogg’s ‘No Deal’ plan for Brexit in the ornate Great Hall of Manchester Town Hall, a smaller group were listening to a German politician in Angela Merkel’s party explain how the EU views the divorce.
“A win-win settlement is excluded and it’s appropriate to speak about a lose-lose result,” Detlef Seif said as his audience of Conservative activists listened in funereal silence.

Historic Mistake

Even though former minister Stephen Dorrell chipped in to say that Brexit is a “historic mistake” and this view “is alive and well in the Conservative Party,” other interventions made it clear that delegates fear their party is in thrall to the hard Brexit advocated by Rees-Mogg and to a certain extent Johnson.
They asked how they can effectively counter myths about the EU peddled by activists in their own party. One pro-leave delegate stormed out of the meeting, accusing the organizers of running a “remain and regret session” and being too negative about Brexit.
Corbyn on Sept. 26. 
Photographer: Leon Neal/Getty Images



The situation in Manchester mirrors the flight from the center at Labour’s conference in Brighton last week. There, old-school socialist Corbyn was idolized by party members as moderates, including Mayor of London Sadiq Khan, felt compelled to pay tribute to cheers from the crowd.
There were queues around the block to get into fringe meetings about the future of Corbynism and T-shirts, pins and even scarves carried the leader’s name. It was clear that Corbyn and those around him had taken control of the party.
Usually at party conferences, the chance to attend side meetings to hear the views of senior figures close-up and question party policies is an irresistible draw for the party faithful, but in Manchester the ministers in the main hall and on fringes weren’t proving much of a draw.
The venues where Rees-Mogg has spoken have been packed beyond capacity. Meanwhile there were free seats and uneaten sandwiches at a question-and-answer session with Brexit Minister Steve Baker.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-10-02/will-the-center-hold-british-politics-heads-to-radical-places

Monday, 2 October 2017

Should May Stay or Should She Go? Tories Tepidly Back Their Boss

The Conservative Party annual conference is in full swing in the northern city of Manchester with the fate of two top Tories on the line: Prime Minister Theresa May and her Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson.
On the surface they back her publicly, but there are signs of disquiet in their language.

The embattled leader: Theresa May

On her own future: The premier told reporters on a trip to Japan at the end of August that she would stand at the next election. “I’m in this for the long term. I’m not a quitter.”

On Johnson: Asked on Sunday whether he was “unsackable,” May laughed and said: “you talk about Boris’s job, you talk about my job. I think the people watching this program are actually interested in what we’re going to do for their jobs and their futures and their children’s futures.”

The perennial pretender: Boris Johnson

On May: After May declared she’d stand again at the next election, he pledged his “undivided” support. But the Sunday Times reported this weekend that he believes she’ll be gone within a year.

On himself: Asked in a pooled TV interview in New York last month if he would quit if he doesn’t get his way on Brexit, Johnson replied: “I think, if I may say, you may be barking slightly up the wrong tree.” On Sunday, he rejected criticism aimed at him, saying “if you studied what I said, it was basically government policy. I think it’s extraordinary that so much fuss has been made.”

May’s deputy: Damian Green

On May: “By 2022 she will have a big record of achievement to show,” he told the Spectator in an interview published Sept. 30.
On Johnson: “Boris clearly has huge talents and having him in the cabinet it gives us those strengths,” Green said on Sunday in an ITV interview.

The man controlling the finances: Philip Hammond

On Theresa May: the chancellor of the exchequer told ITV on Monday that May has “indicated she will fight the next election; if she does so she has my 100 percent support.”

On Johnson and cabinet divisions over Brexit: Hammond told ITV “the real process is going on between us and the negotiating team in Brussels. Everything else is noise.” He told the BBC that "Boris is Boris."

The woman seen as an heiress: Amber Rudd

On Theresa May: the home secretary said “I’m very clear that the cabinet and the government supports Theresa May, at this difficult moment to make sure that we get the best result for the United Kingdom,” she said Sept. 17 in a BBC interview.
On Johnson: In the same interview, she said "you could call it back seat driving,” referring to the foreign secretary’s interventions on Brexit.

The main Brexit negotiator: David Davis

On May: “She’s a great prime minister,” Brexit Secretary told the BBC at the beginning of September. “I have been never anything less than impressed in the way she runs the country. That’s what matters.”
On Johnson: Asked on Sept. 24 in a BBC interview whether Johnson was being a backseat driver, he said “my car’s only got two seats.” He then went on to say "I’m not going to criticize people for having a passionate view."

May loyalist: Greg Clark

On May: Asked on Monday at a fringe event whether May should stand again at the next election, the business secretary replied “Yes. She would stand on the record of having negotiated a successful deal for us on Brexit.”
On Johnson: Asked at the same event if the foreign secretary should be sacked, Clark replied: “No. Boris is a valued member of the cabinet.”

The charismatic Scot: Leader Ruth Davidson

On the leadership: “Let’s get back to why we are here -- to talk about the real issues and not about the Tory psychodrama,” she said on Sunday in a fringe event at the Conservative Party conference.
On Johnson: Discussing Brexit in an interview with The Times on Saturday, she said: “overoptimism and not recognizing that there are practical realities that have to be faced, that have to be worked through and that complexity is not something you just skip over, that you actually have to work through, I think sells people short.’’

The old-school hardliner: Jacob Rees-Mogg

On May: the backbench lawmaker who regularly leads polls on possible successors for May, told a fringe event at the party conference on Sunday that "time will tell” whether she stands at the next election. "Do I want her to? Yes, she has my full support, without question.”

The pro-EU Tory: Nicky Morgan

On Johnson: the chair of the Treasury select committee told BBC radio on Sunday that "If he can’t stop setting down arbitrary red lines then yes he has to go.”

The man who could lead a revolt: Graham Brady

As head of the so-called 1922 Committee made up of backbench Tories, Brady will know when a rebellion will kick off as it will start there, with the rank-and-file.
On May’s future: “I don’t think there is a demand in the parliamentary Conservative Party for a debate about the future leadership of the party.”
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-10-02/should-may-stay-or-should-she-go-tories-tepidly-back-their-boss