Showing posts with label Withdrawal Agreement Bill. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Withdrawal Agreement Bill. Show all posts

Thursday, 23 January 2020

Queen gives assent for Britain to leave EU

Royal assent allows Britain to leave after years of bickering and delays
Dmitry ZAKS
Two top EU officials in Brussels are expected to sign the formal Brexit treaty on Friday (AFP Photo/Kenzo TRIBOUILLARD)

Queen Elizabeth II gave her formal assent Thursday (Jan 23) for Britain to end its decades-long involvement in the European Union and seek a more independent but uncertain future at the end of the month.
The head of state's ceremonial approval of the withdrawal legislation allows Britain to leave its closest neighbours and trading partners after years of bickering and three delays.
Queen Elizabeth’s ceremonial approval of the withdrawal legislation allows Britain to leave the union. (AP pic)
Two top EU officials in Brussels are expected to sign the separation treaty on Friday and Prime Minister Boris Johnson -- the pro-Brexit figurehead of Britain's seismic 2016 referendum -- will put his name on it in the coming days.
"At times it felt like we would never cross the Brexit finish line, but we’ve done it," Johnson said after both houses of the British parliament ratified the withdrawal bill on Wednesday.
"Now we can put the rancour and division of the past three years behind us and focus on delivering a bright, exciting future."
The January 31 split caps a remarkable political comeback for Johnson at one of the most difficult points in Britain's post-war history.
He quit former prime minister Theresa May's government in 2018 in protest at what he viewed as her pro-European separation terms.
Johnson returned as May's successor in July last year and has since managed to negotiate his own deal with Brussels and regain the government's control of parliament in a risky early election last month.
The rest was a formality. Lawmakers barely debated the withdrawal agreement before passing it -- even though critics called it worse for Britain than the one reached by May.
Johnson will celebrate his victory by issuing commemorative coins and chairing a special cabinet meeting in England's pro-Brexit north on January 31.
- 'Absolute priority' -
Johnson will now be responsible for defining the terms on which Britain trades and shares everything from data to fishing waters with the remaining 27 EU member states.
The formal talks are not expected to begin until March but the war of words is already intense.
Johnson rejects EU arguments that the end-of-year negotiations deadline is too short to reach a comprehensive deal.
The UK government is also demanding the post-Brexit right to set its own rules on politically sensitive issues such as environmental standards and workers' rights.
EU officials say this will give Britain an unfair advantage and are threatening to retaliate with tariffs and quotas that could hit the UK auto and pharmaceutical industries especially hard.
European Central Bank chief Christine Lagarde said the bloc's financial system was ready for the next stage.
"There can always be a risk somewhere," she said in Frankfurt. "But I think in good conscience we have covered everything that we thought was necessary."
Some analysts believe Johnson is prepared to pay the price of short-term economic damage in order to deliver on pledge to "get Brexit done".
He argues that greater flexibility will help him reach a quick post-Brexit agreement with the United States and other nations that are growing much faster than those in Europe.
US officials say they are eager to strike a deal with Johnson.
An agreement "is an absolute priority for President (Donald) Trump and we expect to complete that with them this year," US Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin said ahead of his arrival in London this weekend.
US Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross added that Johnson would have an easier time with Washington than Brussels because "there are far fewer issues between the UK and US."
Johnson is expected to lay out his vision for the post-Brexit agreement with Brussels in a big policy address early next month.
"Once we have left the EU in just over a week's time we'll be free to start having discussions with countries around the world including the US," Downing Street said Wednesday.
https://news.yahoo.com/queen-gives-assent-britain-leave-eu-151134088.html

Boris Johnson secures Brexit! EU set to rubber-stamp deal as Queen signs it into UK law

BRITAIN is on course for a smooth Brexit next week after Boris Johnson’s Brussels deal was finally approved by Parliament.

After years of Westminster wrangling, the Prime Minister’s EU Withdrawal Agreement Bill is expected to be enshrined in law by gaining the Royal Assent on Thursday.
MPs on Wednesday rejected five last-ditch amendments to the legislation made by the House of Lords.
And peers shied away from a constitutional clash by accepting the verdict of the Commons and dropping the amendments.

Their climbdown meant the Prime Minister’s deal with Brussels was formally ratified and the UK’s departure from the EU a week today is set to become law.
Hailing the end of the long Westminster war over Brexit, the Prime Minister said: “Parliament has passed the Withdrawal Agreement Bill, meaning we will leave the EU on 31 January and move forward as one United Kingdom.
“At times it felt like we would never cross the Brexit finish line, but we’ve done it.
“Now we can put the rancour and division of the past three years behind us and focus on delivering a bright, exciting future – with better hospitals and schools, safer streets and opportunity spread to every corner of our country.”
Mr Johnson is expected to finalise the ratification process with EU chiefs before personally signing the historic Withdrawal Agreement.
European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and Charles Michel are expected to sign the deal in Brussels on Friday while the Prime Minister will add his signature in the coming days.
The European Parliament is set to rubber stamp the deal next Wednesday. 
Tonight peers accepted the verdict of the Commons
Tonight peers accepted the verdict of the Commons (Image: Getty)
Boris Johnson
EU set to rubber-stamp deal as Queen signs it into UK law (Image: Getty)
Once the legal process has been completed, Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab and EU chiefs will sign an “instrument of ratification” that will be deposited in Brussels to turn the Brexit deal into international law in time for the country’s departure from the bloc at 11pm on 31 January.
 A Number 10 source said: “The British people have waited more than three years to get Brexit done. 
“Passing the Withdrawal Agreement allows us to do this in an orderly way on January 31 and the whole UK to move forward to a partnership with the EU based on an ambitious free trade agreement with no alignment.”
Peace was declared in the long parliamentary war over Brexit at 6.20pm when the Lords backed a series of motions accepting the Commons decision earlier on Wednesday to reject their amendments to the EU Withdrawal Bill.
Silence greeted a call for those who were “not content” with the motions to make their opposition heard. The decision spared Parliament a bout of “ping pong” with the legislation being scuttled back and forth between the two chambers in a stand-off over the amendments.
Speaking in the upper chamber, Brexit minister Lord Callanan said: "We are at the end of what seems like a very long road. The final stages of this Bill represent something which many of us thought might never happen - Parliament passing the legislation necessary to implement a Brexit deal and to finally deliver on the 2016 referendum."
Lord Callanan
Lord Callanan (Image: Getty)
Brexit deal and to finally deliver on the 2016 referendum."
He added: "I know many on the benches opposite are disappointed that the Commons has chosen to disagree with all of the amendments that peers passed this week.
"I would, however, like to reassure peers that their expertise, their contributions will continue to play a valuable role after Brexit.
"Following our exit, this House will see more legislation on a range of topics connected to the departure from the European Union. In some cases, it will be the first time in decades that the UK has legislated on some of these matters."
Earlier, MPs had rejected five changes made by the Lords to the legislation including a clause proposed by the Labour peer Lord Dubs providing extra guarantees for the protection of child refugees.
Peers had also defeated the Government on the rights of EU workers legally residing in the UK to have physical proof of their right to remain and the power of courts to depart from European Court of Justice rulings.
They also backed a proposal underlining a commitment that the UK Parliament "will not normally" legislate for devolved matters without the consent of the devolved legislature affected.
All five amendments were comfortably reversed by MPs, with majorities ranging from 86 to 103 on Wednesday.
Lord Alf Dubs
Lord Alf Dubs (Image: Getty)
During the Commons debate on the amendments on Wednesday, Brexit Secretary Stephen Barclay said the Government could not accept the Lords amendment on citizens' rights as it would make the EU Settlement Scheme "null and void".
Mr Barclay said: "This amendment would mean the successful EU Settlement Scheme in its current form would need to be abandoned. This is because there would be no need to register if people could later rely on a declaration that they were already in the UK.
"This would make null and void the 2.8 million applications and the 2.5 million grants of status which have already been completed."
Mr Barclay said the amendment would also mean the Government would be unable to issue "more secure" digital documentation without physical documentation, adding: "This would increase the risk of fraud and raises the issue of cost to the Government and citizens."
On child refugees, Mr Barclay defended the Government's record before claiming: "Primary legislation cannot deliver the best outcomes for these children as it cannot guarantee that we reach an agreement and that is why this is ultimately a matter which must be negotiated with the EU and the Government is committed to seeking the best possible outcome in those negotiations."
Labour MP Yvette Cooper said: "That is what makes us all suspicious, that he wants to remove it because there's some reason why he thinks it will restrict what he wants to do and therefore that he's going to, in the end, betray the commitments that have been made to the most vulnerable children of all."
Shadow Brexit minister Thangam Debbonaire also said: "The Government's predecessor government has got form on this, promising to take 3,000 children on the Dubs scheme, as originally committed to, and taking fewer than 500 in the end."
https://www.express.co.uk/news/politics/1232079/brexit-news-boris-johnson-eu-deal-the-queen-royal-assent-law

Boris Johnson hails 'new chapter' for Britain as Brexit withdrawal bill is passed by Parliament

  • PM has vowed to 'mobilise the full breadth of our new freedoms' in the Brexit bill 
  • According to a leaked memo, PM will call for national healing and unity on Jan 31 
  • Britain will leave the EU on the 31 January at 11pm now the bill has been passed
The Prime Minister will vow to ‘mobilise the full breadth of our new freedoms’ on Brexit night – as his Bill paving the way for Britain to leave the EU was finally passed by Parliament yesterday.  
A leaked Downing Street memo, setting out how the Government will mark January 31, reveals Boris Johnson will use the occasion to call for national healing and unity.
But he will also make clear that after the UK’s exit it will ‘maximise all the freedoms the British people voted to grasp’, including on trade, immigration and fishing.
Prime Minister Boris Johnson is pictured at 10 Downing Street during People's PMQs today
Prime Minister Boris Johnson is pictured at 10 Downing Street during People's PMQs today 
The script, obtained by the Daily Mail, has been prepared as a basis for remarks to be given by Mr Johnson and ministers on the historic day. 
The PM will hold a Cabinet meeting in the North, before returning to No 10 to make a televised address to the nation in the evening.
Britain will leave the EU at 11pm after Mr Johnson’s Brexit bill cleared its final Parliamentary hurdle yesterday when it was approved by the House of Lords. 
Now all it awaits is Royal Assent and approval by the European Parliament next week.
Queen Elizabeth II attends church at St Mary the Virgin church, Hillington in Sandringham on January 19, 2020 in King's Lynn, England. The Brexit bill has passed through Parliament and is now being sent for Royal Assent to allow Britain to leave the EU on the 31 January
Queen Elizabeth II attends church at St Mary the Virgin church, Hillington in Sandringham on January 19, 2020 in King's Lynn, England. The Brexit bill has passed through Parliament and is now being sent for Royal Assent to allow Britain to leave the EU on the 31 January 
According to the leaked ‘narrative’ plan for Brexit day, which has been circulated to ministers, the PM and his Government will herald ‘the start of a new chapter in the history of our country, in which we come together and move forward united, unleashing the enormous potential of the British people’.
It reveals how ministers will tell the country to come together after three years of division, adding: ‘We will mobilise the full breadth of our new freedoms – from encouraging technology and innovation, to signing new free trade deals around the world. 
As we maximise all the freedoms the British people voted to grasp, we must also work to heal divisions ... and reunite our communities.’ 
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7918471/Boris-Johnson-hails-new-chapter-Britain-Brexit-withdrawal-bill-passed-Parliament.html

Tuesday, 14 January 2020

Could anti-government majority in House of Lords BLOCK Brexit?

BREXIT has taken two and a half years, but now the finish line is in sight. But could the anti-government majority in the House of Lords really block Brexit?

MPs gave their final backing for ’s Withdrawal Agreement Bill which will see the UK implement the government’s  deal last week. The House of Commons voted in support of the deal 220 to 231. Now the Brexit deal moves to the House of Lords and if peers choose to amend it, the deal will come back before MPs. But is it really possible the House of Lords could block Brexit?


On December 12, the UK had their say in the so-called Brexit election whereby the  walked away with a landmark majority.
In total, Mr Johnson’s party gained 48 seats, winning a total of 365 seats out of 650.
By comparison, Labour had their worst result since the 1935 general election.
While this outcome means the Brexit deal has quickly and easily progressed through the House of Commons where the Conservatives retain a large majority, the process could be far from easy for the House of Lords.

Brexit fears: Boris Johnson
Brexit fears: Could Brexit be derailed by the House of Lords? (Image: GETTY)
Brexit fears: MPs in House of Commons
Brexit fears: MPs voted in support of progressing the Brexit Bill this week (Image: AFP)
The House of Commons underwent a political earthquake in December.
But the House of Lords did not change at all to reflect the external political changes.
This means despite the Government majority in the Commons, there is a decided anti-majority in the House of Lords, as it was before December 12.
Now the bill has passed through the Commons it will move to the house of Lords for further scrutiny next week.
The bill covers “divorce” payments to the EU, citizens’ rights, customs arrangements for Northern Ireland and the planned 11-month transition period.
Brexit fears: Brexit news
Brexit fears: How will the House of Lords impact Brexit? (Image: GETTY)
Reformation to the House of Lords is expected at some point.
Currently, if an elected Lords was already in place, it is worth noting that the 15-year tenure plan would still have left the Upper House completely out of sync with the Lower House.
The House of Lords is made up of the following party members:
  • Conservative: 244 members
  • Labour: 181 members
  • Liberal Democrat: 94 members
  • Crossbench: 186 members
  • Non-affiliated: 48 members
  • Bishops: 26 members
  • Democratic Unionist Party: four members
  • Green Party: two members
  • Conservative Independent: one member
  • Independent Social Democrat: one member
  • Independent Ulster Unionist: one member
  • Labour Independent: one member
  • Lord Speaker: one member
  • Plaid Cymru: one member
Boris Johnson’s Brexit deal has been dealt a severe blow after the House of Lords admitted having “serious concerns” about the Withdrawal Agreement Bill.
In the report from the House of Lords European Union Committee, they stated fears the UK/EU Joint Committee lacks transparency or any potential “democratic oversight”.
Speaking about the report, Lord Kinnoull, Chair of the House of Lords EU Committee, said: “The revised EU Withdrawal Agreement Bill has significantly weaker arrangements for transparency and democratic oversight.
“We are concerned that so much of the detail of the Withdrawal Agreement is being left to the UK/EU Joint Committee, a body that will not be subject to any parliamentary oversight and that may not even publish details of the decisions it reaches.
“The lack of any provision in the Bill for the UK Parliament to scrutinise the future relationship negotiations is set in harsh relief compared to the role the European Parliament will play.
“MEPs will be able to undertake detailed and transparent scrutiny of future EU/UK negotiations while parliamentarians in Westminster will be reduced to passive observers.
“This lack of symmetry runs counter to the spirit and letter of ministerial undertakings given to parliament previously.”
Brexit fears: Boris Johnson PM
Brexit fears: Boris Johnson won 365 Conservative seats in the Commons in December (Image: GETTY)
Conservative peer Lord Howell of Guildford wrote in The House Magazine that the House of Lords was out of sync with the “new technological age”.
He wrote: “It is said that the collective memory these days in Whitehall is weak or non-existent.
“My plea to today’s would-be reformers is to glance back at accounts of this past period, which have all been documented in detail.
“At least it might help them from falling again into some of the traps we encountered back then.”
He added: “In fact it [Lords reform] should have been undertaken 10 or 15 years ago when the digital age was already shifting the world order.
“Had we done so we might have grasped a lot earlier, and long before Trump, that the old special relationship of the past 70 years with the USA needed reshaping.
“We might have seen sooner that much closer attention to Asia was essential, where most of the growth in consumer markets is going to be, in which we have to succeed to survive.
“And we might have grasped quicker that all kinds of new networks have grown across the planet, not necessarily between governments but between professions, interests, young people, business and trade in services and knowledge products in which Britain should be seeking the closest possible involvement – not least with the Commonwealth, the biggest network of all in which we are fortunate to be (although barely deserve to be) members.
“A straight discourtesy to the Queen was to exclude any mention of the Commonwealth, of which she is the head and to which she has devoted most of her reign, in either this Gracious Speech or the one before in October.
“This may sound a minor omission, but it tells us clearly one thing – that the strategists and mandarins deep in Whitehall have simply not yet grasped the nature of Britain’s modern exceptionalism, new world role or potentialities in a shifting international order. Roll on the review. “
https://www.express.co.uk/news/politics/1226776/brexit-news-house-of-lords-brexit-bill-withdrawal-agreement-lords-block-brexit-latest

Saturday, 11 January 2020

Act now! Boris must secure trade deal with Trump or Brussels will snare UK in its trap

WITH the Withdrawal Agreement Bill having safely passed the Commons this week, we can be sure that the UK will finally leave the EU on 31st January. We can now move on, at long last, to negotiate the comprehensive Free Trade Agreement with the EU that is in the best interests of both sides.

Prime Minister Boris Johnson addresses the public
Prime Minister Boris Johnson (Image: Getty Images)

But as we do so, it is vital that we also accelerate negotiations with other countries around the world, and especially the United States. If our negotiations with the US and the EU are not concurrent, we run the risk that the EU will drag its heels in order to keep the UK snared up in European regulations. If that occurs, the UK and the US will have lost a significant opportunity to show the world that we are serious about doing things differently.

The US has been one of the strongest forces for liberalised trade on Earth. A deal with the UK – a country at a similar socio-economic level so there can be no race to the bottom, a country where there is a balanced trade relationship – is the ideal candidate for its bilateral agenda, and vice versa. We are each other’s largest source of foreign direct investment. We both employ over 1 million of each other’s citizens.
These strong economic ties are founded upon a deep, enduring bond between our two countries. We are united by our history, our culture and – pace Oscar Wilde – our language. We have a shared system of values. The British Council recently surveyed young Americans, who ranked the UK first against seven other major countries for: “being a force for good in the world”, “valuing individual liberty; and being a strong example of a democratic society.” We have shared interests in sectors like defence, intelligence financial services, and pharmaceuticals where our industries form part of an integrated whole.
The Prime Minister greets US President Donald Trump
Boris must act now to secure a good UK-US trade deal (Image: Getty Images)
I met President Trump last year, so I know that his Administration is enormously pro-British. The President has spoken of looking forward to a “very big and exciting” trade deal. The active and supportive US Ambassador, Woody Johnson, is “very confident about what happens after Brexit.”
A UK-US trade deal will be enormously beneficial for both countries. As the UK emerges once again as an independent player on the global regulatory stage, we can make the case for free trade afresh, working with our allies against those who seek to suppress the extraordinary efforts in wealth creation that have lifted so many out of poverty since 1945.
But we must act now. Given the pressure on the Presidential timetable with an election coming, I very much hope that the Prime Minister will visit the US very soon to advance negotiations and take full advantage of the unique chances which Brexit presents. With the US so prepared to negotiate in earnest, the Government must press on with both US and EU talks in parallel and ignore advice for the EU negotiations to be concluded first.

JAMES FORSYTH Boris Johnson should get Brexit done as he promised and not bend under EU pressure

THE Cabinet meeting on Tuesday brought home to ministers how different a world they are now operating in.
Previously, in weeks where Brexit legislation was before the Commons, discussion was dominated by whether or not the Government had the numbers to win the vote and how it should respond if it did not.
 Boris Johnson should get Brexit done as he promised and not bend under EU pressure
5
Boris Johnson should get Brexit done as he promised and not bend under EU pressure
This time there was barely a mention of Brexit despite the votes on it this week. (The Withdrawal Agreement Bill duly passed the Commons with a comfortable 99 vote majority on Thursday).
Pretty much all Boris Johnson had to say on the matter was to urge ministers to, “banish Brexit”, from their lexicons after January 31, when the UK leaves the EU.
Boris wants ministers to stop talking about Brexit once the UK has left as he doesn’t want the trade negotiations with the EU to dominate British politics in the way that leaving has since the referendum. He wants to show voters that the country has moved on and the Government is once more focusing on the domestic issues voters care about.
But however much he tries, it will be hard to make these talks boring. They are important and there is already DRAMA BREWING.
Boris saw the new Commission President Ursula von der Leyen in Downing Street this week. The pair got on well in their hour-long meeting. They both want these talks to be less acrimonious than the divorce negotiations; both want a more cordial tone.
The pair reminisced about the school they had both attended in Brussels. Unlike Eton, it didn’t have playing fields, and until Johnson arrived the only game in the playground was marbles. He introduced some more rough and tumble.

DETERMINED TO DELIVER

No10 were pleased that von der Leyen, rather than the more confrontational Michel Barnier, took the lead. As one No10 source points out, the EU loathed the lack of clarity and authority under Theresa May: She wasn’t clear what she wanted and it wasn’t certain that she could deliver what she wanted.
With Boris and his new majority it is very different. He was able to point von der Leyen to the Tory manifesto’s commitments on the future trade deal and say this was his mandate and that he was determined to deliver it.
Yet despite the pair’s attempt to maintain a friendly tone, there are already tensions. Boris is irritated that the EU keeps saying it is nigh-on impossible to negotiate a full trade deal by December 2020, despite having signed up to a political declaration that commits it to trying to do just that.
The DANGER is that the EU thinks that under time pressure Boris will bend, that he will either extend the transition period — something he has repeatedly promised not to do — or drop his commitment to breaking away from EU rules and regulations.
Boris is determined not to do either of these things. He doesn’t want to extend and believes in the value of the UK having the right to do things differently.
Both sides have frequently misunderstood each other in this process. Both sides must now realise that the other means what it says. Unless they do, there is going to be an almighty bust-up and no trade deal at the end of all this.
 Both sides must now realise that the other means what they say
5
Both sides must now realise that the other means what they sayCredit: PA:Press Association
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/10715867/boris-should-not-bend-opinion/