Showing posts with label White Paper. Show all posts
Showing posts with label White Paper. Show all posts

Tuesday, 17 July 2018

Britain's May wins parliament vote after bowing to Brexit pressure

British Prime Minister Theresa May won a series of votes in parliament on Monday, keeping her over-arching strategy to leave the European Union just about on track after bowing to pressure from Brexit supporters in her party.
Reuters 17 July 2017 15:32 +8hrs
But by accepting the demands of hardline Brexit campaigners, she exposed her vulnerability in parliament, where both wings of her Conservative Party attacked each other, highlighting the deep divisions that have so far hampered progress in talks with the EU.
May has vowed to stick to her plan to negotiate the closest possible trade ties with the EU, saying her strategy was the only one that could meet the government’s aims for Brexit, the biggest shift in Britain’s foreign and trade policy for decades.
But even before the EU has had time to assess her vision for Britain’s future ties with the bloc, her plans have come under fire from both camps in the Conservative Party. One pro-EU ex-minister called it the “worst of all worlds”, while eurosceptics said the strategy kept Britain too close to the bloc.
On Monday, Brexit supporters targeted the government’s so-called customs bill, hoping to toughen up her plans. But instead of facing them down and fuelling tensions, the government accepted their four amendments.
May’s spokesman said the changes to the bill, formally called the Taxation (Cross-border Trade) Bill, did little more than put government policy into law.
But by hardening the language to emphasize that the future collection of duties and taxes by Britain and the EU be on a reciprocal basis, some lawmakers feared that Brexit supporters may have made May’s plan less sellable to the bloc.
Parliament vote 318-285 to pass the bill. It will now go to the upper house of parliament before becoming law.
After a rowdy debate when Conservatives criticized members of their own party, junior Treasury minister Mel Stride told parliament: “We have had a full, robust and comprehensive debate today as is entirely appropriate for a bill of this importance, importance to our ability to continue after our departure from the EU as one of the world’s great trading nations.”
For now, May’s plans appeared still largely on track.

NOT DEAD YET
May denied a suggestion in parliament that her Brexit plan was dead, and her spokesman said the decision to accept those amendments were “consistent” with the white paper policy document ministers agreed earlier this month.
Where the government might struggle is explaining its acceptance of the demand that the EU must collect tariffs on Britain’s behalf, if London is to do the same - a suggestion one expert said the bloc’s negotiators were unlikely to accept.
The government won the vote on the tariffs amendment with a narrow majority of three lawmakers. Junior Defence Minister Guto Bebb resigned his position after deciding to vote against the government, the 10th Conservative to quit over May’s plan.
The government’s acceptance of the amendments did little to ease the tensions in May’s party, which is at war with itself over the Brexit plans.
In one of the rowdiest debates in parliament on Brexit so far, pro-EU Conservative lawmaker Anna Soubry said: “The only reason that the government has accepted these amendments is because it is frightened of somewhere in the region of 40 members of parliament, the hard no-deal Brexiteers, who should have been seen off a long time ago.”
The battle over the amendments is unlikely to be the last that May and her team will have to face, and may have spurred the government’s move to bring forward parliament’s mid-year summer break to Thursday rather than next week.
May had to fight hard to get the agreement of Cabinet ministers at her Chequers country residence earlier this month for her vision for Britain’s future ties with the EU. It was then undermined by the resignations of Brexit minister David Davis and Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson.
They and other eurosceptic Conservatives say the plan to keep close trade ties with the EU - which is only a starting point for a second phase of talks with Brussels - betrays her promise of a clean break with the 27-nation bloc after Brexit.
From the other wing of May’s party, pro-EU former Education Minister Justine Greening called on Monday for a second referendum, saying it was the only way to break the stalemate in parliament over the best future relationship with the bloc.
Greening branded May’s plan as “a fudge I can’t support. It’s the worst of both worlds”.
May’s spokesman said there would be no second referendum under any circumstances, and restated her position that the Chequers plan was the only way to deliver a Brexit that worked in the best interests of the country.
May said she was sticking with her plans.
“I wouldn’t have gone through all the work that I did to reach that agreement only to see it changed in some way through these bills,” she told parliament.

http://www.theedgemarkets.com/article/britains-may-wins-parliament-vote-after-bowing-brexit-pressure

May Accused of 'Dancing to the Tune' of Hardline MPs for White Paper Amendments

The Brexit whitepaper amendments proposed by the European Research Group and accepted by Theresa May ensure the EU rejects the plan immediately, Remainers say.


Britain's Prime Minister Theresa May commences a meeting with her cabinet to discuss the government's Brexit plans at Chequers, the Prime Minister's official country residence, near Aylesbury, Britain, July 6, 2018
UK Prime Minister Theresa May is under fire again for succumbing to the demands of hardline Brexit proponents among her Cabinet when "faced with the possibility of revolt at Westminster," according to Irish News.
"By capitulating to their proposals on Customs and [the] Trade Bill, she is accepting that the Chequers deal is now dead in the water," Labour MP Stephen Kinnock said Monday.
The House of Commons accused the Prime Minister of "dancing to the tune of the European Research Group," the organization of Brexiteer MPs led by Jacob Rees-Mogg, which include some 60-80 people (there are 316 Conservatives in the House of Commons, according to www.parliament.uk).
A compromise agreement between proponents of various Brexit scenarios, dubbed the Chequers deal, was reached last week and has been altered by Downing Street. Four amendments were added last night at the behest of Brexit supporters.
One of the amendments in question says the UK will only collect duties on behalf of the EU if other EU members agree to do the same for the UK — which, according to the Independent, is not going to happen.
Another amendment cements in a law that there would be no customs border between Northern Ireland and the mainland UK — which many considered a compromise solution in order to evade hard border between the two Irelands.
The others two require the UK to have a separate value-added tax (VAT) system from the EU, and require entirely new legislation if the government is to keep Britain in the customs union. A Prime Minister's Office spokesman defended the acceptance of the amendments, saying: "We believe they are consistent with the white paper we published last week."
The Prime Minister also defended the amendments in question herself.
"I would not have gone through all the work that I did to ensure that we reached that agreement only to see it changed in some way through these bills. They do not change that Chequers agreement," she said to the MPs.
MP Anna Soubry attacked the Prime Minister claiming that European Research Group and Jacob Rees-Mogg are running the country now.
"Who is in charge? Is it the prime minister or is it the honorable member for North East Somerset [Mr Rees-Mogg] — I know where my money is sitting at the moment," she added, according to Independent.
Peter Bone, a signatory to the amendments, said the whole situation was a "shambles" and called for the Chequers plan to be taken off the table.
"I can't possibly dress it up in any other words than it's an absolute shambles and a self-inflicted shambles by Number 10," he said, referring to the Office of the Prime Minister.
Peter Dowd MP, a Labour treasury spokesman, said: "It took two years for the Prime Minister to reach her Chequers deal, but only two days for it to fall apart.
"The white paper lies in tatters, the government is in free fall and Theresa May has no authority left," he added.
Justine Greening, a former Education Secretary, has proposed a second referendum as a solution to the deadlock, saying the Chequers deal in its current state offers the "worst of both worlds."
"The only solution is to take the final Brexit decision out of the hands of deadlocked politicians, away from the backroom deals, and give it back to the people," she said in an article for The Times.

https://sputniknews.com/europe/201807171066419031-theresa-may-chequers-amendments-criticism/

Brexit: Theresa May wins knife-edge customs bill vote as defence minister resigns amid Tory rebellion

Prime minister forced to rely on Labour rebels to help her avoid humiliating defeats as she suffers biggest rebellion of her premiership


Theresa May narrowly saw off a backbench rebellion on a key piece of Brexit legislation during a dramatic night in the House of Commons.
The government managed to get its customs bill passed by MPs despite knife-edge votes in which a number of pro-EU Conservatives voted against their party.
Ms May suffered her biggest rebellion as prime minister as 14 Tories voted against the government. They included Guto Bebb, a defence minister, who effectively resigned his frontbench role by joining the rebels.
Ministers were forced to rely on three Labour rebels - Frank Field, Kate Hoey and Graham Stringer - voting with the government to avoid what would have been two humiliating defeats on a key Brexit bill.
It came after Ms May bowed to pressure and agreed to support four amendments tabled by Tory Brexiteers to the Taxation (Cross-border Trade) Bill.
The most contentious of these will guarantee that the UK only collects tariffs on behalf of the EU - a key part of the prime minister's Brexit strategy, as agreed by ministers at Chequers - if European countries do likewise on behalf of the UK. There is little to suggest the EU would agree to such a policy, casting major doubt over the Chequers plan just 10 days after it was agreed. 
That amendment was passed with a majority of just three, as 305 MPs voted for it and 302 voted against.
A second Brexiteer amendment, which will ensure the UK has an independent VAT policy after Brexit, was also passed by just three votes.
The government also agreed to accept an amendment saying ministers must table full legislation in Parliament if they want to keep the UK in a customs union with the EU, and another that would prevent a customs border being introduced between Northern Ireland and the rest of the UK.
During a series of tight votes, MPs rejected a Labour motion that would have kept Britain in a customs union with the EU.
The late-night drama in the Commons came after a tense day of negotiations between ministers and Brexiteers, culminating in the government agreeing to support the amendments tabled by Eurosceptic Tories in the European Research Group - a bloc of 60-80 MPs led by Jacob Rees-Mogg.
These motions were tabled in a bid to scupper the government's Brexit strategy as agreed by ministers at Chequers earlier this month.
However, in an unexpected development, Downing Street insisted they would not affect Ms May's plans and that the government would therefore accept them.
Theresa May said it was "absolutely wrong" to suggest the ERG amendments were incompatible with the Chequers plan.
She told MPs: “I would not have gone through all the work that I did to ensure that we reached that agreement [at Chequers] only to see it changed in some way through these bills. 
“They do not change that Chequers agreement and the minister from the despatch box later today will be making that clear.” 
A Downing Street source added: “We will be accepting these four amendments because we feel they are consistent with the white paper we published last week.” 
That decision prompted fury from pro-EU Tory MPs, who vowed to defy party orders and vote against the amendments.
In a heated debate, Tory MPs clashed repeatedly over the UK's future relationship with the EU.
Remainer Anna Soubry accused Ms May of “caving in” to Brexiteers and added: "Seems Jacob Rees-Mogg is running Britain."
In the Commons, she said: “The only reason that the government has accepted these amendments is because it is frightened of somewhere in the region of 40 Members of Parliament - the hard, no deal Brexiteers, who should have been seen off a long time ago and should be seen off.
“These are people who do not want a responsible Brexit, they want their version of Brexit - they don't even represent the people who actually voted Leave."
But leading Brexiteers insisted their amendments simply clarified existing government policy.
Sir Bernard Jenkin told MPs: "These amendments were only ever about clarifying government policy, that the UK will not join a customs union with the EU, nor agree to split Northern Ireland from the UK for customs purposes, that we are leaving the EU VAT regime, and any customs arrangement with the EU is not one-sided.
"By accepting these amendments, the government does no more than confirm our understanding of stated government policy."

May Avoids Defeat By 3 Vote Margin As Even More Brexit Chaos Breaks Loose

Just over a week after Theresa May narrowly survived a revolt by Brexiteers which saw several resignations including that of Brexit minister David Davis and Foreign Minister Boris Johnson, on Monday evening May faced another cabinet rebellion, this time by Tory "remainers", when May barely scraped through Customs Union amendments with a nail-biting margin of just 3 votes, and only after 3 Labor MPs voted with the government. More from the Guardian:
The government majority was reduced to just three votes on the most controversial amendment after leading Tory remainer Anna Soubry complained that the prime minister had lost control of events by making concessions to the rightwing European Research Group of MPs.
by Tyler Durden
Mon, 07/16/2018 - 18:49

 

The reason for the Remainers ire is that earlier in the day, May unexpectedly had caved in to Brexiters by accepting their amendments to a customs bill to head off a leadership challenge before the summer break. The most important of the four amendments proposed earlier in the day from the hardliner Brexiteer European Research Group of MPs, or ERG chaired by Jacob Rees-Mogg, had been designed to frustrate May’s compromise proposals over customs arrangements agreed at Chequers and had been initially been opposed by the government until Downing Street made a sudden U-turn in the afternoon.
But wait, weren't Brexiteers furious last weekend precisely because May sided with remainers when she presented her controversial white paper? Why, yes, it is: what happened is that in the span of ten days, May went from angering Brexiteers, who threatened to overthrow May, to infuriating remainers, in the hope of placating Brexiteers.
Or as political correspondent Emily Ashton writes, "the government has narrowly avoided a defeat - by three votes! - from Tory Remainers over an amendment that it only backed in order to avoid a defeat from rebel Brexiteers."

So the government has narrowly avoided a defeat - by three votes! - from Tory Remainers over an amendment that it only backed in order to avoid a defeat from rebel Brexiteers.

And some say US politics is confusing.
In any case, what happened earlier in the day is that Theresa May accepted all four amendments by the Conservatives' European Research Group to today's taxation/customs bill. The amendments were as follows:
  • The UK will only collect duties for the EU if Brussels agreed to reciprocal arrangements
  • A requirement the UK has a separate VAT regime from the EU
  • A requirement that the government tables primary legislation if it wishes to keep the UK in a customs union
  • Enshrine in law that there cannot be a customs border down the Irish Sea – a border May has repeatedly ruled out anyway.
The most important of the four amendments from the ERG, chaired by Jacob Rees-Mogg, had been designed to frustrate May’s compromise proposals over customs arrangements agreed at Chequers and had been initially been opposed by the government until Downing Street made a sudden U-turn in the afternoon.
Surprising pundits, May concluded that all four amendments were “consistent with the Brexit white paper”, a decision that so incensed Tory remainers that they vowed to vote against the amendments in Monday night’s Commons debate.
As a result, the Monday night vote barely passed: the ERG customs union amendment barely passed by 305 to 302, with three Labour MPs voting with the government. A second ERG amendment, preventing the UK joining in with the EU’s VAT regime post Brexit, also passed with a 3 vote margin, 303 to 300. But not before another political casualty emerged: junior minister Guto Bebb resigned, rather than support the ERG customs union amendment, and joined the rebellion against the prime minister’s customs plan.
* *  *
Going back to the leading Tory remainer, Anna Soubry, she had told the Commons that "The only reason that the government has accepted these amendments is because it is frightened of somewhere in the region of 40 members of parliament - the hard, no deal Brexiteers, who should have been seen off a long time ago and should be seen off."
She asked: “Who is in charge?...is it the prime minister or is it the member for North East Somerset [Jacob Rees-Mogg]”.
For may the flip-flop was strategic, and improved her prospects of making through to the summer break without a leadership challenge. Last night, it emerged that Downing Street had proposed bringing forward the summer recess to Thursday, to reduce the time for Conservative MPs to hold a confidence vote if one were called, although Labour and some Tory MPs indicated they were considering voting against any attempt to impose an early holiday.
A total of 48 MPs have to write letters to the party’s backbench 1922 committee calling for a confidence vote, which is normally organised a couple of days after it is called . May would need to win the support of more than half of the party’s 316 MPs to win it.
Then, on Monday morning, May indicated that it had concerns about this amendment and its impact on the customs plan. But there was a change of mind after Rees-Mogg held talks with the party’s chief whip, Julian Smith.
* * *
So for now, Theresa May has avoided political death, but only by a 3 vote margin.
Meanwhile, Bloomberg reports that as rumors of plots against Theresa May swirl around Westminster, a plan is being drawn up to send members of Parliament away on their summer vacation early.
The House of Commons will hold a vote on Tuesday on a move to break up early for the summer recess, according to a person familiar with the matter. The vacation is due to start on Tuesday 24 July but would begin at the end of business on Thursday 19 instead if lawmakers back the plan.
The reason why May - who is under pressure from both pro and anti-Brexit wings of her Tory party and has suffered a succession of resignations from her government team - is now scrambling to send her Party on vacation It’s far harder for legislators to coordinate their opposition to May if they’re dispersed around the country or the rest of the world on vacation and Parliament is not sitting. An early vacation would certainly give welcome breathing space to the government.
There are even bigger problems facing May: as a result of today's vote, she must now try to persuade the EU to collect U.K. tariffs on goods destined for Britain as part of her Brexit plan.
Meanwhile, as May pivots almost daily to extend her political life, in some cases literally by days, fears are growing that there is now no Brexit deal – not the Chequers plan, nor David Davis’s Canada-style trade deal, nor a no-deal scenario – that could command the backing of a majority of MPs.
In other words, May may still be around but Brexit appears all but dead.

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-07-16/may-avoids-defeat-3-vote-margin-even-more-brexit-chaos-breaks-loose

Monday, 16 July 2018

Jacob Rees-Mogg 'RUNNING BRITAIN' after Theresa May CAVES IN on Brexit

THERESA May has caved in to demands from hardline Brexiteers as MPs prepare to vote on a crucial government White Paper.

By Martin Coulter / 

The PM has accepted all four amendments to the Brexit customs bill tabled by a group of Eurosceptic Tory backbenchers.


A Downing Street source said: "We will be accepting these four amendments because we feel they are consistent with the white paper we published last week."
A Brexiteer source said the move confirmed that "Chequers is dead on arrival" after the Government accepted all four reforms put forward by Eurosceptics such as Jacob Rees-Mogg, Sir Bernard Jenkin, Priti Patel and Iain Duncan Smith.
Tory Remainer Anna Soubry suggested Mr Rees-Mogg was now "running Britain".
REES-MOGG
REBEL: Rees-Mogg has been among the most vocal Tory backbenchers
GETTYT


Labour MP Stephen Kinnock accused the PM of "dancing to the tune" of the European Research Group (ERG) of Tory Brexiteers and claimed that by "capitulating", the Chequers deal is now "dead in the water".
But Mrs May insisted the amendments do not change the blueprint agreed at her country residence.
She told MPs: "He is absolutely wrong in his reference to the agreement that was reached at Chequers, I would not have gone through all the work that I did to ensure that we reached that agreement only to see it changed in some way through these Bills.
"They do not change that Chequers agreement and the minister from the despatch box later today will be making that clear."
The news comes just hours after May ruled out a second referendum on leaving the EU “under any circumstances”.
A spokesman told reporters: "The British public have voted to leave the European Union. There is not going to be a second referendum ... under any circumstances.”
Treasury Parliamentary Private Secretary Scott Mann handed in his resignation over fears of a "watered down Brexit".
He is the ninth MP to jump ship in just ten days after former Brexit Secretary David Davis abandoned his post last week.
Former Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson followed Mr Davis, unwilling to compromise on May's "weak" Brexit.
Ben Bradley also quit as Tory party vice-chairman, issuing a harsh warning to the PM.
All eyes are now on the Remainer MPs, who may yet join with Labour to vote against and overturn Government plans. 

Sunday, 15 July 2018

Deal or no deal? May chose 
an uninspiring fudge instead

Theresa May’s Chequers proposal, spelt out in last week’s White Paper, represents an enormous climbdown from what she initially appeared to be aiming for, laid out clearly in her Lancaster House speech in January 2017.

Roger Bootle

15 JULY 2018 • 6:53PM

Theresa May̢۪s Chequers proposal, spelt out in last week̢۪s White Paper represents an enormous climbdown from what she initially appeared to be aiming for
Theresa May’s Chequers proposal, spelt out in last week’s White Paper, represents an
enormous climbdown from what she initially appeared to be aiming for

In particular, by tying us in to EU regulatory standards on goods, it would make it difficult to secure Free Trade Agreements (FTAs) with other countries, including the United States.

Nevertheless, you could argue that this minimal Brexit is better than nothing, and some Leavers have. But this surely depends upon what the other possibilities are. This deserves the serious analysis that Mrs May and her team have apparently not given it.

There are broadly two options. The first is...

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2018/07/15/deal-no-deal-may-chose-uninspiring-fudge-instead/

Thursday, 12 July 2018

Brexit White Paper explained: What Tory Theresa May's plan says - and can it be delivered?

The long-awaited white paper setting out the Government's plans for Brexit has been published. But will it be accepted by Brussels and Tory MPs?

By
Jason BeattieHead Of Politics
  • 16:13, 12 JUL 2018
  • UPDATED16:14, 12 JUL 2018


Theresa May faces a double battle to get her Brexit plans through

The White Paper sets out the UK’s plans for a new trading relationship with the EU, its customs plan and what will happen on immigration.
Brexit Secretary Dominic Raab says the white paper will create an unprecedented economic partnership between the UK and the EU.
But the plans have already been rubbished by pro-Brexit Tory MPs and they could face a hostile reception when delivered to Brussels.

Free trade area for goods


The UK wants free access to stay for car manufacturers 

What the paper says:
The Government wants frictionless access between the UK and the EU for manufactured goods, such as cars, and for agriculture.
This is how it hopes to get round its promise not to create a hard border in Ireland.
Can it be delivered?
Much depends on whether the EU is prepared to accept this carve out.
Brussels has said there can be no “cherry-picking” and may decide it will not allow single market for goods but not services.
The EU has also said that anyone wanting access to the single market must also accept freedom of movement.

A common rulebook

What the paper says:
In order to have free trade in goods and agricultural products, the UK is saying it will abide by EU rules and standards.
The UK will also accept these rules in order to keep its membership of EU agencies such as the European Chemicals Agency, the European Aviation Safety Agency, and the European Medicines Agency.
Can it be delivered?
There are two major problems with this proposal. Firstly, Tory Brexiteers fear that by signing up to EU regulations we will become a rule taker without any say on them.
It will also limit the UK's ability to sign competitive trade deals with countries such as the US.
America would want agriculture included in any trade deal but is not in its interest to pursue such an agreement if we are still adhering to EU standards.
Secondly, if we want to stay in these EU agencies we will have to accept the they are overseen by the European Court of Justice.

New customs arrangement

The UK wants to be the EU's customs officers 
What the paper says:
The UK is proposing a Facilitated Customs Arrangement. This would see the UK collect tariffs on goods entering the UK on the EU’s behalf.
For example, if car was imported from China into Britain before being transported to the EU, the UK would apply its tariffs (which could be cheaper) and collect the tariffs for the EU.
The Government says 96% of imported goods would pay no tariffs upfront.
Can it be delivered?
There are big questions about whether the EU would accept a non-member state collecting taxes on its behalf without being part of the EU’s system of rules and regulations.
The technology for the arrangement is not in place and is highly unlikely to be ready by the end of the transition period in December 2020.

Freedom of movement


Brexit Secretary says freedom of movement will end. But will it? 


What the paper says:
The paper insists free movement will come to an end. But it then talks about wanting to seek “reciprocal mobility arrangements with the EU.”
It also says EU citizens will continue to travel freely without a visa for “tourism and temporary business activity” and students will still be able to come to the UK to study.
Can it be delivered?
The document is very unclear on how the new system will work. It fails to clarify what “temporary business activity” means.
It does not spell out how long is “temporary” or to which workers it will apply.
There is no guidance on whether nurses, for instance, from the EU will continue to be able to work in the UK.

European Court of Justice



The paper has contradictory statements on the role of the European Court of Justice


What the paper says:
At the top of the document the Prime Minister says the UK will end the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice in this country.
The white paper says it will be for Parliament to decide which ECJ judgements it accepts and proposes a new joint committee to resolve judicial disputes.
Can it be delivered?
The paper is contradictory.
While it says we will end ECJ jurisdiction it also says: “Where the UK participates in an EU agency, the UK will respect the remit of the Court of Justice of the European Union.”
Tory Brexiteers have been quick to pick up on this contradiction and claim Mrs May has betrayed one of her red lines.

A deal on services

Services make up 80% of our economy 

What the paper says:
The government wants access to the single market for goods but not for services.
The paper says the UK will have the “freedom to chart its own path” on services.
But it adds: “There will be more barriers to the UK’s access to the EU market than is the case today,” it adds.
Can it be delivered?
Pro Remain MPs cannot understand why we want to keep access for goods but forego it for services when it makes up 80% of our economy.
If there are greater barriers, to use the government’s words, to the EU market that means firms will be penalised.
The paper says it will seek a new deal on services on the “basis of ‘equivalence” with existing EU rules but then says it wants to have regulatory autonomy for the UK.
Much depends on whether the EU is prepared to allow the cherry-picking of market access.
It may decide it is a good deal when they have a trade surplus with the UK on goods but a trade deficit on services.