Thursday, 2 February 2017

MPs back Brexit Bill triggering Article 50 by a landslide in landmark vote as resignations rock Labour

MPs backed a Bill giving Theresa May authority to invoke Article 50 - but 114 MPs opposed it and Jeremy Corbyn was rocked by a rebellion


  • 19:32, 1 FEB 2017
  • UPDATED07:52, 2 FEB 2017


Video thumbnail, Brexit landmark: The moment MPs voted to back Article 50 bill
THE MOMENT MPS VOTED TO BACK ARTICLE 50 BILL
Britain took a major step towards leaving the EU tonight as MPs backed triggering Brexit by a landslide.
The House of Commons voted 498-114 for a Bill giving Theresa May authority to invoke Article 50, which begins Britain's two-year EU exit.
MPs also defeated an SNP bid to block Article 50 by 336 votes to 100.
A total of 47 Labour MPs, about a quarter of those who voted, opted to try and block Brexit. Shadow Home Secretary Diane Abbott abstained, but initial reports suggested she was ill.
Shadow equalities minister Dawn Butler and shadow environment secretary Rachael Maskell both quit so they could vote against triggering Article 50.
Ms Butler said to back the "poor excuse of a Bill" would "let down future generations" while Ms Maskell warned Theresa May's Brexit "goes far beyond just leaving the European Union".
MPs voted to back the Article 50 Bill - but Labour's Brexit chief Keir Starmer
 faced a rebellion 
MPs waved through Article 50 - but dozens of Labour MPs rebelled

Labour's Rachael Maskell quit warning May's plan "goes far beyond" just Brexit 
The Labour leader subjected his MPs to a top-level 'three-line' whip and said shadow cabinet rebels must resign.
But a source had said he would "decide later" if junior frontbenchers who rebelled must do the same.
The landmark vote came after two days of long and emotional debate which saw MPs make passionate arguments for and against leaving Europe.
It was the first of two votes on the so-called "Article 50 Bill", a two-sentence law that will let Theresa May pull the trigger for Britain's two-year journey to leave the EU.
She was forced to allow the debate by the Supreme Court and the final vote, after a committee stage, will be next Wednesday.
Brexit Secretary David Davis opened the debate by warning it's a "very simple question: do we trust the people or not?”

Brexit Secretary David Davis declared: "Do we trust the people or not?"


The PM was forced to hold the debate by the Supreme Court and campaigner Gina Miller 
But the Bill's short length and timetable prompted fury among MPs who wanted longer to scrutinise it before March 31, Mrs May's deadline to invoke Article 50.
So too did the delay over a Brexit White Paper detailing the government's plans, which will now be published tomorrow.
In one barnstorming speech, Tory veteran Ken Clarke compared the PM's trade fantasies to Alice in Wonderland.
KENNETH CLARKE'S BARNSTORMING SPEECH ON TRIGGERING ARTICLE 50
Furious SNP MP Angus MacNeil said: "The UK is boldly going where even North Korea fears to go."
Labour MP Rupa Huq warned: "There may be a crock of something at the end of the rainbow - it just may not be gold."
Rupa Huq
Rupa Huq turned noses by warning a "crock of something" was at the end of the rainbow 


Labour MP Neil Coyle was forced to apologise by the Speaker after he said the government was "full of b*stards" - a reference to awkward Tory eurosceptics.
Shadow Brexit Secretary Sir Keir Starmer admitted the Bill was "difficult for Labour" but said Article 50 must go ahead, adding: “The result was not technical. It was deeply political.”
Closing the debate, Shadow Brexit minister Jenny Chapman warned it would be to "hide from the truth" to pretend there weren't dangers ahead.
"Xenophobia, fear and isolationism are downing out our values of inclusion, hope and tolerance," she declared.
"It is more important than ever to stand beside those values."
LABOUR MP CALLS TORIES A 'GOVERNMENT FULL OF B*****DS'
She vowed to fight "not for the 48%, not for the 52%, but for the 100% of people in Britain."
Former Chancellor George Osborne told MPs the referendum had cost him his job but said he would now be voting in favour of leaving the EU.
In a speech which was also critical of Theresa May, Mr Osborne said the PM has chosen "not to make the economy the priority".
He warned the looming Brexit talks will be "bitter" and said ministers must "be well-briefed and pack a pack of Pro Plus - because there are going to be many long nights ahead."
GEORGE OSBORNE WARNS MPS THEY WILL NEED PRO PLUS FOR LONG NIGHTS NEGOTIATING BREXIT
Other pro-Remain MPs spoke of their fears for Britain's future direction.
Jo Stevens, one of the Labour frontbenchers who quit, said the child of a German constituent had been "spat at and told to go home" in primary school and condemned ex-PM David Cameron for abandoning his responsiiblities.
Former SNP leader Alex Salmond said politicians had been gripped by "mad MP disease" over Brexit and were now taking "the entire country into the hole".
Tory MP Nicky Morgan, the former Education Secretary, added: "Never in my adult life have I felt so concerned about the stability and the state of the world in which we live. I have to say with the Brexit vote we have added to that instability."

Labour MP Jo Stevens warned the child of a German constituent had been spat at


Former Labour leader Ed Miliband said he would vote for Article 50 but accused Mrs May of driving Brexit Britain into the arms of Donald Trump.
"I can go along with the Prime Minister that Brexit means Brexit but I cannot go along with the idea that Brexit means Trump," he said.
Yet Tory Remainer Anna Soubry condemned Labour for "turning their backs on their long-standing belief in the free movement of people".
She added: “For the party opposite to go against everything it ever believed in is really quite shameful."
Walking out to vote on the SNP amendment, Theresa May chatted with Sir Nicholas Soames.

Jeremy Corbyn abstained on the SNP amendment that bidded to block Article 50 
Many Labour MPs including Jeremy Corbyn sat on the green benches abstaining.
When it came to the main vote, Tory MP Chloe Smith carried her baby through the chamber, encouraged by Speaker John Bercow.
Former Cabinet Minister and leading Brexiteer Iain Duncan Smith asked: "Does that count as two votes?"
The bill will now pass to the Lords as Theresa May looks to get it through Parliament in time to trigger Article 50 before her deadline of March 31.

Wednesday, 1 February 2017

Brexit bill clears first legislative hurdle

Prime Minister Theresa May's plan to take Britain out of the European Union easily cleared its first legislative hurdle on Wednesday, paving the way for the government to launch divorce talks by the end of March.





  •  
Wed Feb 1, 2017 | 10:29pm GMT
May's government is seeking approval for a new law giving her the right to trigger Article 50 of the EU's Lisbon Treaty - the legal process for leaving the bloc - after the Supreme Court ruled she could not take that decision unilaterally.
The bill could complete the legislative process by March 7.
May wants to begin exit negotiations with the EU by March 31, starting two years of talks that will define Britain's economic and political future and test the unity of the EU's 27 remaining members.
Lawmakers voted by 498 to 114 in favour of allowing the bill to progress to the next, more detailed legislative stage. Earlier they rejected an attempt to throw out the bill, proposed by pro-EU Scottish nationalists.

A man poses with an electronic copy of the Brexit Article 50  bill, introduced by the government to seek parliamentary approval to start the process of leaving the European Union, in front of the Houses of Parliament in London, Britain, January 26, 2017.  REUTERS/Toby Melville
A man poses with an electronic copy of the Brexit Article 50 bill, introduced by the government to seek parliamentary approval to start the process of leaving the European Union, in front of the Houses of Parliament in London, Britain, January 26, 2017.REUTERS/Toby Melville
The Scottish National Party's Europe spokesman Stephen Gethins described the vote in a statement as "a devastating act of sabotage on Scotland's economy".
A majority of voters in Scotland and Northern Ireland in last summer's referendum backed remaining in the EU, while voters in England and Wales supported Brexit.
Wednesday evening's votes came after two days of impassioned speeches in parliament, which have underlined the lingering sense of shock among the largely pro-European political establishment that 52 percent of their constituents voted to leave the EU in the June 23 referendum.
Despite presiding over a Conservative Party divided over staying in the EU, May, who campaigned for a 'Remain' vote, secured almost unanimous support from her lawmakers for the legislation.
The opposition Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn had also pledged his party's support for the bill at this stage, but 47 of his lawmakers defied his order and voted against the bill.



Labour and other opposition parties will try to amend the bill at the next stage - due to start next week - to give parliament greater scrutiny over the Brexit talks.









http://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-britain-eu-article

House of Commons vote moves Britain closer to Brexit

Brexit moved a step closer after British MPs voted for the first time in favour of legislation to pave the way for Prime Minister Theresa May to trigger the formal process of leaving the EU.
01/02/2017 - 20:21:55
The European Union (Notification Of Withdrawal) Bill will allow the Prime Minister to invoke Article 50 of the EU treaties and was backed by 498 MPs to 114, a majority of 384, at second reading in the House of Commons, its first stage.
But Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn was unable to contain a revolt on his frontbench as two shadow cabinet ministers quit so they could defy his orders and vote against the Bill.
Shadow environment secretary and York Central MP Rachael Maskell and shadow equalities minister and Brent Central MP Dawn Butler both defied a three-line whip so they could vote in line with their heavily Remain-backing constituencies.
advertisement

Mr Corbyn will decide later on how to respond to an expected rebellion among junior frontbenchers over Article 50.
Following a marathon 17 hours of debate over two days, MPs will now await the publication on Thursday of the Government's promised white paper setting out its strategy for withdrawal from the EU.
Downing Street said it would "reflect the Government's plan for Brexit as the PM set out in her speech on our negotiating objectives".
The major Commons skirmishes on the Bill are expected to take place next week during its committee stage, when the Government is likely to face attempts to amend it from all sides.
A total of 47 Labour MPs defied Mr Corbyn's orders and voted against the Bill.
Former chancellor Ken Clarke was the only Conservative to vote against the legislation.
A total of 10 Labour junior shadow ministers and three whips, who are supposed to enforce party discipline, voted against triggering Article 50 in revolt against Mr Corbyn.
The frontbenchers were shadow sport minister Rosena Allin-Khan, shadow culture minister Kevin Brennan, shadow police minister Lyn Brown, shadow housing minister Karen Buck, shadow crime minister Rupa Huq, shadow Northern Ireland minister Stephen Pound, shadow housing minister Andy Slaughter, shadow foreign office minister Catherine West, shadow energy minister Alan Whitehead and shadow transport minister Daniel Zeichner.
The whips were Thangam Debbonaire, Vicky Foxcroft and Jeff Smith.
Shadow home secretary Diane Abbott, a close ally of Mr Corbyn, did not vote.
A Labour source said she was "taken ill" and left Parliament at about 5pm.
https://www.breakingnews.ie/world/house-of-commons-vote-moves-britain-closer-to-brexit-775129.html

Column - Why should we all die for one man?

IN the early thirties, Germany was in severe economic recession and in decline. In 1933, Adolph Hitler brainwashed and won over the disillusioned German working class to be elected as the chancellor.

Posted on 1 February 2017 - 06:59pm
Last updated on 1 February 2017 - 07:16pm
IN the early thirties, Germany was in severe economic recession and in decline. In 1933, Adolph Hitler brainwashed and won over the disillusioned German working class to be elected as the chancellor.
Hitler adopted a pro-fascist and right-wing nationalist ideology. He singled out the Jews as the "problem" and a root cause of the unemployment and other social ills. He rallied the people to make Germany great again. He wanted Germany to be the emerging European superpower, with its allies, Japan and Italy, to conquer the rest of the world, to be their colonies of the new world order.
Today, the United States is losing its global influence and is facing a stagnant economy with many working class people feeling neglected and disillusioned by the establishment in Washington.
In 2016, a "hero" emerged in the United States to fight for its working class and speak out against unemployment, poverty and the economic decline. He wanted to make America great again.
He has implied that ordinary peace-loving Muslims are the culprits and cause of terrorism. He saw Muslims as the "problem", like how Hitler saw the Jews.
Like Hitler, Donald Trump was democratically elected to be the president and commander-in-chief of the most powerful nation on earth.
He has been promoting Islamophobia by perpetuating stereotype myths about Muslims based on the same right-wing ideology that Hitler used.
There are two kinds of nationalism.
The first is Progressive (or Defensive) Nationalism, which is about fighting for freedom, self-determination and independence against foreign domination and control. It can be violent when the colonial or foreign power uses terror and repression to silence the population. For countries such as India and Malaysia, it was generally peaceful.
The other type – Right-Wing Nationalism – is negative, oppressive and often pro-fascist and is sweeping parts of the Western world. It is based on arrogance, ignorance, bigotry and racism, especially Islamophobia. These nationalist extremists profess the right to oppress minorities and blame them for causing social problems.
Within days of taking over as president on Jan 20, Trump signed an executive order to ban all ordinary people from Iran, Iraq, Syria, Libya, Yemen, Somalia and Sudan from entering the US. He suspended the Syrian refugee programme. The civilised world is outraged.
Many Muslims were traumatised by this ban. Trump's excuse was to prevent Muslim terrorists from entering the US but he did not show any facts to support the case. Neither did he explain why the ban was selective and did not include Muslim countries such as Saudi Arabia and Pakistan.
Palestinians are still fighting for their homeland and are even prepared to compromise on a UN-sponsored two-state solution (accepting the existence of Israel) for the sake of peace. However, Trump seems to oppose the two-state solution without offering any constructive proposal. Furthermore, his support of illegal Israeli settlements on occupied West Bank and his idea on moving the US Embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem are causing international outrage and undermining the peace process.
His "America First" policy seems to be pitting America against the world, including the United Nations.
The US is withdrawing from the Trans-Pacific Partnership trade deal in favour of bilateral and regional trade pacts, which Trump feels that the US would have stronger bargaining power.
The US has been benefiting immensely from globalisation including the influx of talented and skilled people from other countries to make America prosper. For the world's largest economy to adopt such an inward-looking policy is stupid, arrogant, selfish and irresponsible. It will come back to haunt America.
The huge turnouts in the marches in support of women in Washington and all over the world during Trump's inauguration showed the strong sentiments against Trump's remarks and acts.
Pushing for building his border wall with Mexico is aimed at playing to the gallery on xenophobia in a country based historically on migration of people from Europe and elsewhere.
Trump seems to be pushing the world closer to a nuclear holocaust with his hawkish foreign policy and to "greatly expand nuclear capabilities".
Former Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev has issued a warning that the world is getting closer to a nuclear war than before. Gorbachev was responsible for bringing an end to the Cold War era.
The "Doomsday Clock" maintained by the influential Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists' Science and Security Board has just been moved to two-and-a-half minutes to midnight (Doomsday). It was an important symbolic gesture that the world is now closer to a nuclear catastrophe than ever before.
Trump may also be playing a dangerous game of brinkmanship by trying to cosy up to Russia, perhaps with the aim of trying to "contain" China. Trump may be trying to treat Russia in the same way that Hitler forged an alliance with Japan before World War II. Trump may also perceive China as the main threat to America now like how Hitler viewed Britain then as the biggest stumbling block to his grand expansionist plan. Trump seems intent to provoke and infuriate China.
Trump does not seem to care for the environment. He poured scorn over the science of global warming and is trying to get the US out of the latest UN treaty on climate change. He has just signed an executive order to revive two large oil pipeline projects in the US which critics argue are bad for the environment.
His arrogance, self-denial and carelessness may cause his own downfall. He may be impeached by Congress, probably over a "conflict of interest" matter which his vast business empire may have with his executive position or if there is a case of "betrayal" or "treason" over some future event involving a foreign leader.
He has made enemies of his own powerful intelligence community and the big US news media, both of which he vehemently attacked and disparaged earlier.
Americans are not opposed to their president making lasting peace with Russia or collaborating with Russia to fight terrorism but they would be against any secret deals which may compromise the long-term interests of the US and its allies in the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation.
While Trump may have boasted about going for a second term, he may not even survive a full first term in office until 2021.
Let's pray that while serving as the commander-in-chief of America, Trump will not do anything which would lead to the destruction of humanity and if it were to happen, (he must know) it will certainly include himself, his family, relatives, friends and his business empire.
But why should we all die for Donald Trump?
The writer is an independent political analyst and strategist who believes that justice will eventually prevail. Comments: kktan@the sundaily.com
http://www.thesundaily.my/news/2147669

MUST READ: What is the process for Britain's Brexit legislation?

The British government needs to pass legislation before it can trigger the formal Article 50 process of leaving the European Union. Below is a summary of the legislative process and the points to look out for.
 Wed Feb 1, 2017 | 12:55pm GMT
OVERVIEW
Prime Minister Theresa May has said she wants to trigger Article 50 by the end of March. Britain's Supreme Court has ruled that parliamentary approval to do so is required.
In response, the government has said it intends to seek approval by passing legislation. This means drawing up a bill and getting approval from both the elected lower house and unelected upper house of parliament to pass that bill into law.
"I will do everything in my power to make sure that the measure goes through ​swiftly and that, while it is properly scrutinised, it is a simple and straightforward bill that delivers the triggering of Article 50 by March 31," Brexit minister David Davis told parliament.
KEY POINTS
- The bill was published on Jan. 26. The full text is here: (reut.rs/2jCH8oN)
- It will be subject to votes in both houses of parliament.
- It is expected to pass both houses in time to trigger Article 50 by the end of March.
- Lawmakers will try to amend the bill in both houses of parliament. This could slow the process but is not expected to cause significant delays or result in major changes to the bill.
- The first debate in the House of Commons started on Jan. 31 and will finish on Feb. 1. This will culminate in a series of votes at 1900 GMT which the government is expected to win.
- A further three days of debate will begin on Feb. 6 to discuss amendments to the bill. For more details see:
- Parliament breaks for a recess from Feb. 9 until Feb. 20, which will interrupt the process.
- The House of Lords is expected to begin debating the bill on Feb. 20 and could complete its scrutiny by March 7.
- The Conservative government has a working majority of 16 in the 650-seat lower House of Commons. Votes are passed by a simple majority.
- The government does not have a majority in the unelected House of Lords but Labour and Conservative Party sources have said there is a willingness to ensure the legislation can be passed in time to trigger Article 50 by March 31.
PARTY POSITIONS
CONSERVATIVE (329 seats): May's ruling Conservatives are expected to vote in favour of the legislation, though a small number may abstain or vote against.
LABOUR (229 seats): Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn will ask his lawmakers to vote in favour of passing the legislation. Corbyn is expected to try to amend the bill but says he will not frustrate the process. A number of Labour lawmakers could defy his wishes.
SCOTTISH NATIONAL PARTY (54 seats): The SNP have said they will seek to amend the bill in parliament. Scotland's Brexit minister said SNP lawmakers would vote against the triggering of Article 50 as a majority of Scottish voters voted in last June's referendum to remain in the EU.
LIBERAL DEMOCRATS (9 seats): The strongly pro-EU party has said it will try to amend the legislation to allow for a second referendum on the shape of Britain's final deal with the EU. If unsuccessful its lawmakers will vote against the legislation.
STAGES OF A BILL:
FIRST READING (Jan. 26) - A formality.
SECOND READING (Jan. 31 to Feb. 1) - A debate is held to allow the house to agree to the principle of the legislation. Lawmakers must vote to approve the second reading for the bill to progress. Vote is due at around 1900 GMT on Feb. 1.
PROGRAMME MOTION (Feb. 1) - Immediately after the second reading, the government will then put forward a programme motion, setting out the time it plans to allow for debate at each of the remaining stages. If lawmakers do not feel the government is allowing enough time for debate they could reject this motion.
COMMITTEE STAGE (Feb. 6 to Feb. 8)- This will be the first opportunity for lawmakers to put forward amendments to the bill. They can either propose changes or add new clauses. The deputy speaker will select which amendments are going to be debated.
The House of Commons will then debate the bill and the amendments. They will then be asked to vote on the bill and each of the amendments.
REPORT STAGE - If any amendments are voted through by the house at committee stage, the bill will pass to report stage. This is a new opportunity to add amendments. The speaker of the house oversees this process.
THIRD READING - This takes place immediately after report stage. It usually lasts an hour and is a general discussion of the bill. No amendments can be made.
HOUSE OF LORDS - The bill then passes to the House of Lords. Lords can put forward amendments, each of which will be discussed and decided on in turn.
The lords are not expected to want to be seen to be frustrating the will of the people by opposing the bill or slowing it down too much, but may seek to make some changes.
If the lords agree amendments the bill passes back to the House of Commons for its approval.
PING PONG - If the bill passes back to the commons, they debate and vote on the lords' amendments. No new amendments can be introduced. In theory the bill can continue passing back and forth between the lords and commons until the final bill is agreed upon.

ROYAL ASSENT - Once the bill has been agreed by both houses of parliament, it is given royal assent, when the Queen formally agrees to make the bill into an Act of Parliament.
http://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-britain-eu-article