Thursday 30 September 2021

Covid 'leaked from Wuhan lab in cover up worse than Watergate', new book claims

Covid-19 was leaked from a Chinese lab in a "cover up" that's been slammed as "worse than Watergate", it has been claimed in a new book on the pandemic. 




The first case of the novel coronavirus was reported in Wuhan back in December 2019, and the mainstream theory has since been that the virus had natural origins around the city, perhaps in the 'wet market'.

But almost two years on - and more than 4.7million deaths since the pandemic broke out across the world - author and investigative journalist Sharri Markson said there is evidence the virus was leaked.

According to the Sydney-based author of What Really Happened in Wuhan, her research and interviews corroborate the theory that the outbreak accidentally slipped from China's Wuhan Institute of Virology, a claim China has always vehemently denied.

Some of those first infected with coronavirus in October 2019 "now appear difficult to track down", John Ratcliffe, Trump’s former director of national intelligence, said, according to inews.

The alleged disappearance of Wuhan lab worker Huang Yanling in January has only served to fuel speculation of a cover-up.

Former MI6 chief Sir Richard Dearlove said the "weight of evidence" suggests Covid leaked from a lab but doesn't believe it was ever intentional.

"If you look at the evidence coldly, the likelihood is this is an escape from a laboratory, and it's up to the Chinese to demonstrate conclusively to us that it isn't, not just to tell us," he told Markson.

He added: "I'm not saying they deliberately released it, I'm saying this is a Chinese accident but there was a cover-up from day one."

Robert O'Brien, Donald Trump's former National Security Advisor, echoed this as he called for "international supervision" of China's laboratory research.

"I always thought whether it was the wet market or the lab was somewhat immaterial given the history of past health crises; they keep coming out of China and affecting the entire globe," he said.

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/world/covid-leaked-from-wuhan-lab-in-cover-up-worse-than-watergate-new-book-claims/ar-AAOWOvY?ocid=msedgntp

Wednesday 29 September 2021

China sends 19 fighter jets towards Taiwan in show of force

 China has sent 19 fighter jets towards Taiwan in a large display of force.


© Provided by PA Media Undated file photo released by the Taiwan Ministry of Defence of a Chinese PLA J-16 fighter jet (Taiwan Ministry of Defence via AP)


This happened after the self-governing island announced its intention to join an 11-nation Pacific trade group that China has also applied to join.

Taiwan deployed air patrol forces in response to the Chinese jets and tracked them on their air defence systems, the island’s Defence Ministry said in a statement.

Among the various jets, some of which flew in a long L-shaped path, were 12 J-16 and two J-11s, as well as bombers and an anti-submarine aircraft.

China has sent fighter jets toward Taiwan on an almost daily basis this past year. It stepped up its military harassment of the self-ruled island after political events in which it views as interfering with its sovereignty.

Taiwan and China split during a civil war in 1949, but China continues to claim Taiwan as part of its territory. Beijing opposes Taiwan’s involvement in international bodies.

Taiwan has applied to join the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership, setting up another potential clash with Beijing.

China’s military sent 18 planes towards Taiwan last year when a top US diplomat visited the island and met with top government officials.

In June, it sent 28 warplanes after leaders of the Group of Seven industrialised nations issued a statement calling for a peaceful resolution of tensions over Taiwan Strait issues.

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/world/china-sends-19-fighter-jets-towards-taiwan-in-show-of-force/ar-AAOJBKy?ocid=msedgntp

Wednesday 22 September 2021

China 'is going back to a policy of total control'

China 'is going back to a policy of total control,' short seller says amid crackdowns

Aarthi Swaminathan  Yahoo Finance   20 Sep 2021   

© Provided by Yahoo! Finance China's President Xi Jinping leaves APEC Haus, during the APEC Summit in Port Moresby, Papua New Guinea November 18, 2018. REUTERS/David Gray


Beijing’s latest moves to crackdown on various sectors in the Chinese economy is spooking some investors, and one short seller believes that this is simply the start.

"I know the bulls wanted to say: 'It's just going to be the education stocks,' and then it was the crackdown on gaming," short seller Dan David told Yahoo Finance Live (video above). 

In the last few months, the Chinese government under President Xi Jinping has started tightening regulations across various sectors such as gaming — both in terms of casinos and kids playing video games — in addition to Big Tech in the country and even celebrity culture.

“We really are not even in the beginning stages of the crackdown,” the Wolfpack Research Founder and CIO added. “China is going back to a policy of total control.”

Part of Xi’s focus is addressing the wealth inequality in China: There are 626 billionaires in China as of last year, as compared 724 to the U.S., according to Forbes. In contrast, Chinese Primer Li Keqiang said that there were 600 million people in China earning a monthly income of barely 1,000 yuan — roughly around $155 — during a 2020 press conference

State messaging indicates that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is pursuing the concept of “common prosperity” to address the wealth gap.

"We will adhere to the mainstay status of the people and the direction of common prosperity, and always practice development for the people, development by the people, and sharing the fruits of development by the people," the CCP's most recent five-year plan stated. "We will protect the people's fundamental interests, inspire the enthusiasm, initiative, and creativity of all the people, promote the well-being of the people, and continuously realize people's aspirations for the good life (美好生活)."

From a foreign investor’s perspective, according to David, these developments made it “very dangerous” for U.S. investors to hold Chinese stocks. He also stressed that with big mutual funds like BlackRock, Vanguard, Fidelity still exposed to Chinese companies, that would put investors “at great risk.”

'They’ve missed out on what’s going on in China'

Some experts and investors still remain optimistic regarding the outlook for foreign companies in China — at least for the time being.

Cowen Research’s Oliver Chen told Yahoo Finance Live that he was “bullish on luxury goods” in the U.S. as well as China.

“Consumption has changed in China, where it’s more inside China, versus traveling,” said Chen. “The luxury market is very robust, as wealthy people have benefitted from stock market appreciation, real estate appreciation.” Chen added that he saw a lot of momentum for companies that are targeted to the middle-class, such as Coach and Tapestry.

Chen also acknowledged possible headwinds for foreign companies in China, especially for the brands catering to the ultra-rich. For instance, even though Louis Vuitton has an “outstanding presence” in China, Xi’s desire to achieve a “common prosperity” and the “egalitarian nature in China" could present a big risk to the luxury sector, said Chen.

Bridgewater co-chief investment officer Ray Dalio also argued for investing in China despite the crackdowns.

"I have found that most Western observers... interpret moves like these two recent ones as the Communist Party leaders showing their true anti-capitalist stripes even though the trend over the last 40 years has clearly been so strongly toward developing a market economy with capital markets, with entrepreneurs and capitalists becoming rich," Dalio wrote in a LinkedIn post on July 30, referring to the crackdown in the ride-hailing and education sectors.

"As a result, they’ve missed out on what’s going on in China and probably will continue to miss out," the billionaire hedge fund manager added. "I urge you to not misinterpret these sorts of moves as reversals of the trends that have existed for the last several decades and let that scare you away."

At the same time, no one outside of the CCP really know what comes next.

“While US regulators are primarily focused on just four Big Tech companies, the Chinese government is targeting dozens and has the centralized power to act quicker and more aggressively than the US,” DataTrek’s Jessica Rabe wrote in a recent note. “This nuance makes it trickier for investors to navigate the current environment, especially as Chinese regulators remain tightlipped about everything they have planned."

https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/savingandinvesting/china-we-really-are-not-even-in-the-beginning-stages-of-the-tech-crackdown-short-seller-says/ar-AAOBKDj

Monday 20 September 2021

China ... in the early stages' of the tech crackdown?

 China: 'We really are not even in the beginning stages' of the tech crackdown, short-seller says

Yahoo Finance   Aarthi Swaminathan  

Beijing’s latest moves to crackdown on various sectors in the Chinese economy is spooking some investors, and one short seller believes that this is simply the start.


"I know the bulls wanted to say: 'It's just going to be the education stocks,' and then it was the crackdown on gaming," short seller Dan David told Yahoo Finance Live (video above). 

In the last few months, the Chinese government under President Xi Jinping has started tightening regulations across various sectors such as gaming — both in terms of casinos and kids playing video games — in addition to Big Tech in the country and even celebrity culture.

“We really are not even in the beginning stages of the crackdown,” the Wolfpack Research Founder and CIO added. “China is going back to a policy of total control.”

Part of Xi’s focus is addressing the wealth inequality in China: There are 626 billionaires in China as of last year, as compared 724 to the U.S., according to Forbes. In contrast, Chinese Primer Li Keqiang said that there were 600 million people in China earning a monthly income of barely 1,000 yuan — roughly around $155 — during a 2020 press conference


State messaging indicates that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is pursuing the concept of “common prosperity” to address the wealth gap.

"We will adhere to the mainstay status of the people and the direction of common prosperity, and always practice development for the people, development by the people, and sharing the fruits of development by the people," the CCP's most recent five-year plan stated. "We will protect the people's fundamental interests, inspire the enthusiasm, initiative, and creativity of all the people, promote the well-being of the people, and continuously realize people's aspirations for the good life (美好生活)."

From a foreign investor’s perspective, according to David, these developments made it “very dangerous” for U.S. investors to hold Chinese stocks. He also stressed that with big mutual funds like BlackRock, Vanguard, Fidelity still exposed to Chinese companies, that would put investors “at great risk.”


'They’ve missed out on what’s going on in China'

Some experts and investors still remain optimistic regarding the outlook for foreign companies in China — at least for the time being.

Cowen Research’s Oliver Chen told Yahoo Finance Live that he was “bullish on luxury goods” in the U.S. as well as China.

“Consumption has changed in China, where it’s more inside China, versus traveling,” said Chen. “The luxury market is very robust, as wealthy people have benefitted from stock market appreciation, real estate appreciation.” Chen added that he saw a lot of momentum for companies that are targeted to the middle-class, such as Coach and Tapestry.

Chen also acknowledged possible headwinds for foreign companies in China, especially for the brands catering to the ultra-rich. For instance, even though Louis Vuitton has an “outstanding presence” in China, Xi’s desire to achieve a “common prosperity” and the “egalitarian nature in China" could present a big risk to the luxury sector, said Chen.

Bridgewater co-chief investment officer Ray Dalio also argued for investing in China despite the crackdowns.

"I have found that most Western observers... interpret moves like these two recent ones as the Communist Party leaders showing their true anti-capitalist stripes even though the trend over the last 40 years has clearly been so strongly toward developing a market economy with capital markets, with entrepreneurs and capitalists becoming rich," Dalio wrote in a LinkedIn post on July 30, referring to the crackdown in the ride-hailing and education sectors.

"As a result, they’ve missed out on what’s going on in China and probably will continue to miss out," the billionaire hedge fund manager added. "I urge you to not misinterpret these sorts of moves as reversals of the trends that have existed for the last several decades and let that scare you away."

At the same time, no one outside of the CCP really know what comes next.

“While US regulators are primarily focused on just four Big Tech companies, the Chinese government is targeting dozens and has the centralized power to act quicker and more aggressively than the US,” DataTrek’s Jessica Rabe wrote in a recent note. “This nuance makes it trickier for investors to navigate the current environment, especially as Chinese regulators remain tightlipped about everything they have planned."

https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/savingandinvesting/china-we-really-are-not-even-in-the-beginning-stages-of-the-tech-crackdown-short-seller-says/ar-AAOBKDj


Op-ed: Will China's President Xi’s big bet pay off?

 Chinese President Xi Jinping is making the most audacious geopolitical bet of the 21st century.

  • For China, that bet has many faces: a rapid rollback of economic liberalization, a crackdown on individual freedoms, an escalation of global influence efforts and military buildup.
  • At the same time, President Xi has launched a push to share the virtues and successes of the Chinese authoritarian model with the rest of the world.

20 Sep 2021  Frederick Kempe  15 hrs ago   CNBC

© Provided by CNBC China's President Xi Jinping speaks during a bilateral meeting with U.S. President Donald Trump at Trump's Mar-a-Lago estate in Palm Beach, Florida, April 7, 2017.




Chinese President Xi Jinping is making the most audacious geopolitical bet of the 21st century.

A head-spinning series of seemingly disparate moves over recent months add up to nothing less than a generational wager that Xi can produce the world's dominant power for the foreseeable future by doubling down on his state-controlled economy, party-disciplined society, nationalistic propaganda, and far-reaching global influence campaigns.

With each week, Xi raises the stakes further, from narrowing seemingly mundane personal freedoms like karaoke bars or a teenager's permitted time for online gaming to three hours weekly to the multimillion U.S. dollar investor hit from his increased controls on China's biggest technology companies and their foreign listings.  

It is only in the context of Xi's increased repressions at home and expanded ambitions abroad that one can fully understand Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison's decision this week to enter a new defense pact, which he called "a forever agreement," with the United States and the United Kingdom.

Much of the news focus was either on the eight nuclear-powered submarines that Australia would deploy or the spiraling French outrage that their own deal to sell diesel submarines to Australia was undermined by what French officials called a "betrayal" and a "stab in the back" from close allies. France went so far as to recall its ambassador to the United States for the first time in the history of the NATO alliance.

All that noise should not distract from the more significant message of the ground-breaking agreement. Prime Minister Morrison saw more strategic advantage and military capability from the U.S.-U.K. alignment in a rapidly shifting Indo-Pacific atmosphere, replacing his previous stance of trying to balance U.S. and Chinese interests.

"The relatively benign environment we've enjoyed for many decades in our region is behind us," Morrison said on Thursday. "We have entered a new era with challenges for Australia and our partners."

For China, that new era has many faces: a rapid rollback of economic liberalization, a crackdown on individual freedoms, an escalation of global influence efforts and military buildup, all in advance of the 20th national party congress in October 2022, where Xi hopes to seal his place in history and his continued rule.

Former Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd, one of the world's leading China experts, points to Xi's "bewildering array" of economic policy decisions in a recent speech as president of the Asia Society.

They started last October with the shocking suspension of Alibaba financial affiliate Ant Group's planned initial public offering in Hong Kong and Shanghai, clearly aimed at Alibaba co-founder Jack MaThen in April, Chinese regulators imposed a $3 billion fine on Alibaba for "monopolistic behavior."

In July, China's cyber regulator removed ride-hailing giant Didi from app stores, while an investigative unit launched an examination of the company's compliance with Chinese data-security laws.

Then this month, China's Transport Ministry regulators summoned senior executives from Didi, Meituan and nine other ride-hailing companies, ordering them to "rectify" their digital misconduct. The Chinese state then took an equity stake in ByteDance, the owner of TikTok, and in Weibo, the micro-blogging platform.

Xi was ready to accept the estimated $1.1 trillion cost in shareholder value wiped from China's top six technology stocks alone between February and August. That doesn't factor in further losses among the education, transportation, food delivery, entertainment and video gaming industries.

Less noticed have been a dizzying array of regulatory actions and policy moves whose sum purpose appears to be strengthening state control over, well, just about everything. 

"The best way to summarize it," says Rudd, "is that Xi Jinping has decided that, in the overall balance between the roles of the state and the market in China, it is in the interests of the Party to pivot toward the state." Xi is determined to transform modern China into a global great power, "but a great power in which the Chinese Communist Party nonetheless retains complete control."

That means growing controls as well over the freedoms of its 1.4 billion citizens.

Xi has acted, for example, to restrict the video gaming of school-aged children to three hours a week, and he has banned private tutoring. Chinese regulators have ordered broadcasters to encourage masculinity and remove "sissy men," or niang pao, from the airwaves. Regulators banned "American Idol"-style competitions and removed from the internet any mention of one of China's wealthiest actresses, Zhao Wei.

"The orders have been sudden, dramatic and often baffling," wrote Lily Kuo in the Washington Post. Jude Blanchette of the Center for Strategic and International Studies says, "This is not a sector-by-sector rectification; this is an entire economic, industry and structural rectification."

At the same time, President Xi has launched a push to share the virtues and successes of the Chinese authoritarian model with the rest of the world. 

"Beijing seeks less to impose a Marxist-Leninist ideology on foreign societies than to legitimate and promote its own authoritarian system," Charles Edel and David Shullman, the recently appointed director of the Atlantic Council's new China Global Hub, wrote in "Foreign Affairs." "The CCP doesn't seek ideological conformity but rather power, security, and global influence for China and for itself."

The authors detail China's global efforts to not remake the world in its image, but rather "to make the world friendlier to its interests — and more welcoming to the rise of authoritarianism in general."

Those measures include "spreading propaganda, expanding information operations, consolidating economic influence, and meddling in foreign political systems" with the ultimate goal of "hollowing out democratic institutions and norms within and between countries," Edel and Shullman write.

Within President Xi's bold bet lie two opportunities for the U.S. and its allies.

The first is that Xi, by overreaching in his controls at home, will undo just the sorts of economic and societal liberalization China needs to succeed. At the same time, the world's democracies, like Australia, are growing more willing to seek a common cause to address Beijing.

In the end, however, Xi's concerted moves require an equally concerted response from the world's democracies. The French-U.S. crisis following the Australian defense deal this week provides just one example of how difficult that will be to achieve and sustain.

82 Comments

b Sirius37m
If you’re more concerned about China’s domestic affairs than your own country’s aggressive foreign policy toward China it’s because you’ve been propagandized. Change your media consumption habits accordingly.

Glen Gard4h
Sorry to say they can't be trusted at all.  My opinion they are biting the hands that feed them. Back in the 70's they were a third country. Our Western/Capitalism Ideals saved this country from ruin. What they have done i.e. stolen technology while our Govt's / Wall Street Execs have ignored because of GREED will be the downfall of the free world. 


harry forrester6h
Welcome to the Communist way of life

eon flores9h
Remember how Japan and Germany started world wars ½ for economic power building up strong military.



https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/markets/op-ed-will-china-s-president-xi-s-big-bet-pay-off/ar-AAOBybw

Saturday 18 September 2021

UK economic growth to smash official forecasts this year

The UK economy will grow faster than official forecasters expect this year and the rate of expansion will be higher in the long term, according to a new report released today.

Ratings agency Fitch says the British economy will grow 6.6 per cent this year, higher than the Office for Budget Responsibility’s four per cent forecast.

Thursday 16 September 2021 5:11 pm      CityAM

Ratings agency Fitch says the British economy will grow 6.6 per cent this year, higher than the Office for Budget Responsibility’s four per cent forecast (Photo by Peter Summers/Getty Images)

The successful vaccination programme in the UK enabled policymakers to lift economic restrictions quicker than other rich nations, providing a boost to the economy throughout the second quarter.

The relatively earlier reopening of the UK economy has dampened British consumers’ concerns about catching Covid and driven spending to similar patterns seen before the pandemic, Fitch said.

The link between rising Covid cases and weaker economic activity has been severed as consumers have acclimated to living with the virus.

The OBR does think the UK economy will grow faster in 2022. However, its 1.7 per cent growth forecast for 2023 is significantly lower than Fitch’s prediction of a 2.2 per cent expansion in output.

The UK economy is anticipated to grow faster than both the US (6.2 per cent) and Eurozone (5.2 per cent) this year.

According to the Office for National Statistics, the UK economy grew just 0.1 per cent in July.

Fitch upped its inflation forecast for the UK, hiking to reach 3.4 per cent annually by the end of this year and four per cent in early 2022. Despite both these figures being above the Bank of England’s target, the ratings agency does not expect the Old Lady to hike rates until 2023. 

According to the ONS, consumer price inflation and input inflation currently sit at 3.2 per cent and 11 per cent on an annual basis.

Ongoing worker shortages and sustained supply chain snarl ups could derail the economic recovery, Fitch noted.


AUKUS submarine deal caused grave rift among allies

France: AUKUS submarine deal has caused one of the gravest rifts among Western allies in living memory


France's decision to recall its ambassadors has dashed hopes on the on the UK, US and Australian side that normal relations with Paris would resume once "disappointment" at losing out on the multi-billion pound submarine deal faded, Sky's Deborah Haynes writes.



French foreign minister Jean-Yves Le Drian said the snub 'constitutes unacceptable behaviour between allies and partners'. File pic



France's drastic decision to recall its ambassadors to the United States and Australia marks one of the gravest rifts among allies in living memory.

And it will also be watched by rivals like China and Russia with glee.

The extraordinary diplomatic rebuke follows a decision by Canberra to ditch a French submarine contract for a new nuclear submarine partnership with Washington and London.

Yet the French fury - conveyed in a communique by the foreign minister - omitted any mention of Britain even though the UK is clearly also in the firing line.

Gerard Araud, a former French ambassador to the US, wrote on Twitter: "You can interpret the omission of the UK as a sign of conciliation or contempt. Your choice."

The French move dashes hopes on the UK, US and Australian side that normal relations with Paris would resume once French "disappointment" at losing out on the multi-billion pound submarine deal faded.

Their so-called AUKUS partnership was meant to be about bolstering the defences of democratic countries in the face of a growing challenge posed by authoritarian China in the Indo-Pacific and beyond.

But instead of strengthening western unity, it has triggered this significant rupture - an outcome that could well be exploited by Beijing and Moscow.

Any friction between western allies is an opportunity for their authoritarian rivals to amplify.

The US, UK and France are all members of the G7 group of industrialised, democratic powers and the NATO defence and security alliance, while Australia is also a close and like-minded ally.

Frantic efforts will be going on behind the scenes to try and defuse the row

However, President Emmanuel Macron, heading into an election year, has been badly bruised on the international stage and needs to hit back.

His country not only lost a big chunk of business when Australia sank the submarine contract, but it will also miss out on the prestige of providing the Australian navy with such a strategic asset over several decades.

Adding to the injury, Mr Macron will have to watch the US and the UK take France's place.

Not a great look for a president who sees his country as the predominant military power in Europe.

The anger was clear in foreign minister Jean-Yves Le Drian's statement: "The abandonment of the ocean-class submarine project… and the announcement of a new partnership with the United States… constitutes unacceptable behaviour between allies and partners".


https://news.sky.com/story/france-aukus-submarine-deal-has-caused-one-of-the-gravest-rifts-among-western-allies-in-living-memory-12410901