Friday, 31 August 2018

JAPAN TIMES Brexit Headlines: 1 Aug - 31 Aug 2018

The Japan Times

BREXIT














Brexit: Barnier says no deal unless operational backstop agreed

Agreement must be signed by November at the latest, EU’s chief negotiator says

Britain’s Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union Dominic Raab, left, and EU chief Brexit negotiator Michel Barnier prepare to shake hands after a media conference at EU headquarters in Brussels. Photograph: Virginia Mayo/AP
Britain’s Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union Dominic Raab, left, and EU chief Brexit negotiator Michel Barnier prepare to shake hands after a media conference at EU headquarters in Brussels. Photograph: Virginia Mayo/AP
 
Brexit deal must be signed by “November at the latest”, the EU’s chief negotiator has warned.
Michel Barnier told a press conference in Brussels there will be no agreement unless an operational “backstop” arrangement for the Irish Border can be agreed.
In the event of a hard no-deal Brexit, the EU wants a backstop that would effectively create a border down the Irish Sea between the island of Irelandand Great Britain.
But he said was “determined” to reach an agreement ahead of the October deadline, though he said there would be “flexibility” for further negotiations.
Standing alongside UK Brexit secretary Dominic Raab, he said: “Week after week and step by step we are eliminating subjects, bones of contention... I’m determined, we’re going to find an agreement for an orderly withdrawal which is much better than the opposite and Dominic and I think it’s possible to reach that in October.”
Mr Barnier added: “If you take account of the date chosen by the United Kingdom to leave, that’s March 29 which is in UK law and you simply count backwards the time that you need for ratification about three months here or there then it takes you to November at the latest. “It’s as simple as that.”
It follows concerns that a deal may fail to materialise before the deadline.
Mr Raab said that he wanted to continue “accelerating and intensifying” negotiations, adding: “We’re committed to resolving the deal by (the October council) and ultimately on my side I am stubbornly optimistic that a deal is within our reach.”
Earlier, Mr Barnier said a backstop is “essential to conclude the negotiations”, stating: “With no backstop there will be no agreement.” He described the issue as a “matter of some urgency”, adding that he had asked the Brexit Secretary to provide data on how the “necessary controls and checks take place”.
British prime minister Theresa May has repeatedly said she will refuse to contemplate any backstop deal that treats Northern Ireland differently from the rest of the UK.
The UK Government insists that any backstop position should include the UK as a whole. Mr Raab said the government “remained committed” to finding a solution in Northern Ireland.
He said: “On Northern Ireland we remain committed to giving effect to the joint report, continuing the work on the potential solutions, working with Michel and his team on some of the issues he’s raised and continuing to drive that forward.
“The solutions must be workable, they’ve got to be workable for the communities living in Northern Ireland and living in the Republic of Ireland.”
Mr Barnier also told media in Brussels that the future partnership between the EU and UK would be without precedent. He said: “If we achieve what was in the March guidelines then you really do have a partnership with no precedent, this a very ambitious free trade agreement, specific agreements in all sorts of area of common interest.”
Mr Barnier was later asked if he believed the Conservative Party Conference would have an impact on negotiations, he said: “I’m not going to comment on the internal political life on the UK, conferences of this party or that party. “We’re negotiating with Theresa May’s Government with Dominic Raab and his team and they’re the ones round the negotiating table.” –PA
https://www.irishtimes.com/news/politics/brexit-barnier-says-no-deal-unless-operational-backstop-agreed-1.3614162




EU CHAOS: Italy threatens to LEAVE the EU's migrant rescue mission

ITALY has warned the EU it will pull out of the European Union’s search and rescue mission (SOPHIA) in the Mediterranean unless other members of the bloc agree to rescue the landings of illegal migrants.

Speaking after a meeting of EU defence ministers in Vienna, Matteo Salvini, interior minister and leader of the far-right Lega party, claimed Rome was “assessing” whether to continue the EU's Sophia mission, which currently lands all rescued migrants in Italian ports.
Italian Defence Minister Elisabetta Trenta expressed her disappointment on Thursday after no agreement was reached on changing port of landing rules.
She said: "I feel disappointed because I've seen that Europe is not here but I'm confident.
"We will assess what to do.”
When asked whether Italy would pull out of the mission, Ms Trenta said: "All decisions will be taken with the government and Premier Giuseppe Conte.”
Federica Mogherini, EU’s foreign affairs chief, said there has been “no consensus on practical solutions” on the mission proposed changes.
Mrs Mogherini, who is Italian, added she hopes to achieve something more concrete in the next following weeks.
She noted: "It is not and will not be am easy exercise but it is a duty, because in these last few years we have proved that the EU can make a difference in the Mediterranean.”
Italy news, matteo salvini news, EU news, brexit, migrants, migrants EU,
Italy has warned the EU it will pull out of SOPHIA (Image: Getty)

Italy news, matteo salvini news, EU news, brexit, migrants, migrants EU,
Matteo Salvini promised the country to clamp down on illegal immigration (Image: Getty)
This comes as Italian interior minister Matteo Salvini promised the country to clamp down on illegal immigration by closing the country’s harbours to boats carrying migrants.
His decision first sparked a row between the European Union and the Italian government in June, when Mr Salvini left stranded at sea for five days 630 people, including pregnant women and children.
The die-hard eurosceptic leader has often criticised the Brussels bloc for its lack of support.
Last week he claimed Italy should start making cuts to annual funds sent to the European Union after the latest migrant rescue boat docked in the Sicilian port of Catania.
Italy news, matteo salvini news, EU news, brexit, migrants, migrants EU,
Mogherini, who is Italian, said she hopes to achieve something more concrete in the following weeks (Image: Getty)
He told supporters in Pinzolo: “Europe has demonstrated once again to be unprecedented filth that doesn’t deserve our money.
"From the first to the last one of them, no one cared.
“And I ask for your mandate to re-discuss the billions Italy sends to Brussels every year.
“I think the time has come to make some cuts to funds given to a useless institution that turns its back when we most need it.”
https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/1011052/Italy-news-Matteo-Salvini-leave-EU-migrant-rescue-mission-SOPHIA


Brexit? The real enemy lies within, says FREDERICK FORSYTH

EVERY day and in every way (as Monsieur Coué did not say) we are threatened and threatened and threatened. You cannot open a newspaper nor switch on the telly but another disaster is solemnly laid before you - and all based on the presumption that we will not bow to Brussels and call off Brexit.
These Jeremiahs promise us no plane will fly, no ship will sail, no lorry will roll and no surgeon will address his scalpel. Why? Because we will have run out of everything.
Remember the Millennium Bug? It was very similar.
The same straight faces, the same ponderous loons assured us that at a few seconds after midnight on New Year's Eve civilisation as we knew it would come to an end.
The computers would all crash because they could not cope with the end of a millennium and the start of another.
The moment came. What happened? Damn all.
Why did the Jeremiahs not resign en masse and in shame? Because they never do.
It all happened again, in miniature, during the Campaign of Fear which preceded the referendum vote.
If we voted Leave, said George Wiseguy Osborne, recession and slump would be our immediate portion. The reverse happened. Investment went up.
Former Chancellor of the Exchequer George Osborne
Former Chancellor of the Exchequer George Osborne (Image: GETTY)

Start-up companies increased (a sign of optimism). Employment went up (ditto). The pound weakened but that was good for exports.
Now it looks as if the euro is heading for trouble in a big way. If we leave as the majority still wishes, and we prosper, will the Jeremiahs resign or be fired? They most certainly should.
I hope someone is noting every disaster-prediction and the source of it.
A year after Brexit, if we are booming with worldwide exports going through the roof as seems likely, I hope today's doomsayers are given a firm kick in the tailored rear ends.
Prime Minister Theresa May is fighting to keep brexit on track
Prime Minister Theresa May is fighting to keep brexit on track (Image: GETTY)
The fact is that all negotiations start with the two parties poles apart.
But with goodwill and the triumph of reason they move towards each other with matching concessions until victory with a concordat.
But if one side does all the demanding and refusing and the other side all the conceding, that is not a negotiation but a capitulation. That is what Michel Barnier demands.
It is also what the British appeasers, quitters and quislings advise.
 Dominic Raab (L) speaks next to EU Chief Brexit Negotiator Michel Barnier
Dominic Raab (L) speaks next to EU Chief Brexit Negotiator Michel Barnier (Image: GETTY)
Once again the disaster script is waved before all our eyes. Scuttle to Brussels or face utter British ruin.
Even the massively concessionary Chequers plan has been rejected. So why do the Tory weaklings go on advising it? It is dead.
My own prediction is simple: no, there will not be an equitable (evenhanded) new deal to endorse a mutually beneficial relationship because Barnier will not have it.
His agenda is simple: Britain must suffer agonies as a deterrent to any other dreamer of freedom. So..? So there will be a year of dislocation and damage as we negotiate a raft of blistering free trade treaties with the rest of the trading world.

May announces UK plan to become biggest G7 investor in Africa


Then we surge out of the swamp and back to the high ground, trading very profitably with numerous economies we were required to turn our backs on for the past 50 years.
But defeat? Ruin? Eternal poverty? Check the record. We Brits have been around for a thousand years uninvaded. Often threatened, never defeated. Often assaulted, never beaten. Sometimes knocked back, never brought low. And so it will be this time if only we can throw out the weaklings, the appeasers, the capitulators.
Our real enemies are here at home, many in high office, living off hard-grafting taxpayers, strutting, whining, moaning but rarely picking up their own tab.
Ten years from now I think they will be looked back on as the appeasers of 1938. They have the same DNA. Concession before sovereignty.
https://www.express.co.uk/comment/columnists/frederick-forsyth/1011077/brexit-theresa-may-eu-uk-trade-deal

Also Read: 
Conservatives split again by Hammonds Brexit Warning


British Jews’ Corbyn problem

There’s no evidence Labour leader’s anti-Semitic view will turn voters off.

8/31/18, 8:04 AM 

Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn | Leon Neal/Getty Images
LONDON — Today, Jewish life in Britain is under greater threat than at any time since World War II, and it is because of one man — Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn — and the fetid politics that surround him.
It’s now almost impossible for any British Jew to plausibly defend him. Only outliers remain.
Over the past few weeks, a barrage of reports in the British press have shed light on the Labour leader’s anti-Semitic worldview. Among the relentless slew of revelations: a video of Corbyn promoting the propaganda site of terror group Hamas in 2013, in which he took aim at his favorite subject, the perfidy of “Zionists.”
“[British Zionists] clearly have two problems,” he said. “One is they don't want to study history, and secondly, having lived in this country for a very long time, probably all their lives, they don't understand English irony either.”
“For me, Corbyn’s patronizing, racialized put-down of British ‘Zionists’ and our sense of history and English irony was no surprise” — David Krikler, Jewish communications consultant
It’s the latest link in a chain of scandals that have engulfed the Labour Party over anti-Semitism this summer. And it is serious.

Existential threat

“For a community with a history like ours, you can’t underestimate the need for Jews to feel like they belong, like they are accepted, like they are safe,” said Claudia Mendoza, head of policy at the U.K.’s Jewish Leadership Council, speaking more in sorrow than anger.
At the end of July, Britain’s three largest Jewish publications took the unprecedented step of carrying matching front pages calling Corbyn an “existential threat” to Jewish life in the U.K.
It is important to understand the gravity of what was done: The Jewish community has not felt compelled to do anything so drastic since Oliver Cromwell readmitted the Jews to this island in the mid 1600s.
Many in the community thought the papers were being hysterical. They were quickly disabused. Footage emerged of Corbyn taking part in a wreath-laying ceremony at a cemetery in Tunisia in 2014. The wreath was laid at the graves of Black September terrorists who masterminded the murder of 11 Jewish athletes at the 1972 Munich Olympics.
Labour party leader Jeremy Corbyn | Chris J. Ratcliffe/AFP via Getty Images
The photos went viral. Corbyn’s critics rushed to damn him for yet another anti-Semitism scandal, while his defenders rushed to protect him from the disgraceful smears of  “Blairites” and “Zionists.” He was actually paying his respects to those killed by Israeli security service Mossad and not the Munich killers, went one line. When that defense fell apart, Corbynistas claimed he had not actually laid a wreath. Or perhaps he had but had been unaware. At this point, no one actually knew what the party line was anymore. Of course many didn’t care. And, of course, many more thought he had done nothing wrong.
When a fringe far-left magazine featured Jewish Labour MP Margaret Hodge on its cover with the strapline “The Enemy Within” emblazoned across it — a classic anti-Semitic trope that was chosen through a vote of the magazine's readership — it was yet another sign of the pollution of Britain's far left. Hodge had recently called Corbyn a “racist anti-Semite” to his face and suffered a predictable deluge of abuse as a result.
The Jewish community absorbed the escalating backlash with great alarm. Jewish organizations even demonstrated against Corbyn earlier this year. Many were angry, bitter. Now things are of a different order entirely. Now people are seriously afraid.
“The Jewish newspapers were right,” said Mendoza. “Jews from across the political and religious spectrum — literally ranging from orthodox to completely secular — have said they will not want to stay in this country under a Corbyn premiership. Who knows what would actually happen. But if that’s the case — if Jews leave en masse — how is that not an existential threat?”

Politics as usual

My social media feed is full of Jewish acquaintances and public figures talking about their fear and anger over the Labour Party. Mandy Blumenthal, a descendant of the former mayor of Birmingham, recently said in a TV interview she was moving to Israel because Corbyn had let the anti-Semitic “genie out of the bottle.”
Others are just angry.
“For me, Corbyn’s patronizing, racialized put-down of British ‘Zionists’ and our sense of history and English irony was no surprise,” said David Krikler, a Jewish communications consultant in London. “His political career has been spent in the company of Holocaust deniers, anti-Semites and terrorist groups, so I don’t need to hear him sounding like an old-fashioned anti-Semite to know exactly what he stands for.”
“It’s been interesting to see some commentators say they can no longer defend him after seeing that,” he added. “I think it’s telling that they were prepared to defend his support for organizations that literally murder Jews, whether on Israeli buses, in Olympic villages or in Argentinian community centers, but they’re more concerned by a linguistic micro-aggression. Support for anti-Semitic terror groups is fine, as long as you don’t sound like an elderly racist who’s had one drink too many in the process.”
People hold up placards and Union flags as they gathered for a demonstration organized by the Campaign Against Anti-Semitism outside the head office of the British opposition Labour Party in central London back on April 8, 2018 | Tolga Akmen/AFP via Getty Images
Britain’s Jews now live in hope that the barrage of evidence that Labour is an institutionally anti-Semitic party, from its leadership to significant elements of its membership, will be off-putting to voters.
Unfortunately, for many like Krikler, that seems unlikely. The recent Corbyn revelations are not actually revelatory — his views were well-known before the issue flared up this summer. And yet they haven’t stopped him from winning two Labour leadership elections or over-performing in the 2017 general election.
Among the British Jews I’ve spoken to, the most common fear is that anti-Semitism is so niche and the scandals so abstruse that ordinary voters will find it hard to grasp what the problem is.
The unavoidable fact is that Labour is led by a politician with a lifetime history of anti-Semitic, anti-Zionist politics. Even the U.K.’s former chief rabbi, Jonathan Sacks, has called Corbyn “an anti-Semite” who has “given support to racists, terrorists and dealers of hate.” That someone of his stature should be so unequivocal in his language about the leader of Her Majesty’s official opposition is astonishing. And yet that is where we are.
“First you get the anti-Semitism, then, when you call it out, your honesty and integrity is called into question for doing so” — David Krikler, Jewish communications consultant
Corbyn and his acolytes respond as they always do. The Dear Leader has no problems with Jews, only those who support Israel. The implication being that those who label him an anti-Semite do so in the service of defending Israel.
“It is doubly isolating,” saids Krikler. “First you get the anti-Semitism, then, when you call it out, your honesty and integrity is called into question for doing so.”
Corbyn and the Jews. It’s a relationship that started out badly and now seems beyond repair, to the great distress of a people who have called Britain their home for centuries.
David Patrikarakos is a freelance journalist and author of several books, including "War in 140 Characters: How Social Media is Reshaping Conflict in the Twenty-First Century" (Basic Books, 2017). 
https://www.politico.eu/article/british-jews-labour-party-jeremy-corbyn-problem-anti-semitism/