Friday, 30 June 2017

JAPAN TIMES Brexit Headlines: 1 Jun - 30 Jun 2017

The Japan Times
Brexit Headlines


Britain seeks 'special' EU ties as Brexit talks kick off in Brussels

BUSINESSJUN 20, 2017

Britain's negotiators came to Brussels seeking a "new, deep and special partnership with the European Union" on Monday as talks on the unprecedented British withdrawal from the bloc finally got under way. A beaming Brexit Secretary David Davis, a veteran campaigner against EU membership, told ...
British voters wake up and ask: Who are the DUP?

WORLD / POLITICSJUN 10, 2017

British voters spent Friday frantically Googling the name of a small Northern Irish party whose 10 seats hold the balance of power in Parliament. As Britons awoke to news that Prime Minister Theresa May would have to turn to the Democratic Unionist Party for support ...
May dealt crushing blow, blurring Brexit talks

WORLD / POLITICSJUN 9, 2017

British voters dealt Prime Minister Theresa May a devastating blow in a snap election she had called to strengthen her hand in Brexit talks, wiping out her parliamentary majority and throwing the country into political turmoil. With no clear winner emerging from Thursday's election, a ...




Five reasons why Brexit will be fine without a deal

Project Fear continues to spread scare stories about Brexit on a daily basis. The hysteria mainly centers on the alleged catastrophe if we leave the EU with no deal. John Redwood MP deals with five key issues which rip the Remain case to shreds


Happy_dover
Dover will still be happy without a deal
6f37592038ebe4c2dc83c06bb82884256d790fa4
John Redwood MP
On 30 June 2017 06:19
The latest scare stories doing the rounds seek to suggest that the UK could not trade successfully with the rest of the EU from outside the single market and customs union if there is no deal. I have explained in general terms why I think this is wrong, but there is still some demand for more detail.
I will supply it. It is always difficult tackling nonsense, as there are no limits to the amount of nonsense you have to tackle. I am choosing the most common examples.
1. “Planes will not be able to fly to and from the continent and the UK the day after we leave, as there will be no Air Services Agreement in place”, say some gloom mongers. Many air travel routes carry on daily around the world without a formal Air Services Agreement. All you need is a landing permission in the airport you are going to, and you need to get a flight path from air traffic control in controlled space.
If there is no deal then the UK will of course allow EU carriers to continue with the landing slots they currently have, and the rest of the EU will do the same for UK carriers. The EU will not want to ban plane loads of UK tourists and other visitors from going to their countries and will not want to lose the landing revenues at their airports.
2. “The need for customs clearance will mean massive queues at our borders, with disruption to the supply system for the UK”, argue some pessimists. Both the EU and the UK as a member of the EU are currently putting in new streamlined customs procedures to handle third party imports.
These will work fine for the rest of EU goods as well, if necessary. Under customs simplified procedures for freight there is already a system of electronic registration of consignments, with the ability to undertake customs clearance at the importers premises once the goods have been successfully delivered.
The EU will want decent procedures on the UK side of the channel as they export so much to us, including big volumes of perishable agricultural products.
3. “The need for products to comply with EU rules will hold up movements of goods”, say some negative commentators. At the moment, all UK goods exported to the EU conform with EU rules anyway. In future there is likely to be be mutual recognition of each other’s standard granting bodies, as with non EU country trade.
There can also be continuity of the current system of self certification by manufacturers of the standards and specifications of their products. The EU will want this for their exports to the UK. None of this need physically hold up goods crossing borders, where electronic documentation will have been filed in advance and cover all necessary details about consignments.
4. “Complex supply chains will incur tariffs that make Assembly of components from different sides of the Channel uneconomic”, say those who often have never run complex supply chains.
Most components are zero rated for tariff if they are included in a good which attracts a tariff on final sale, or of course for a good which is rated at zero tariff. Some components do attract low level tariffs which are more than offset by the fall in sterling against the Euro. I have never experienced difficulties in bringing in components from non EU sources in my past life with manufacturing companies. 
5. “Rules of origin will be too difficult to sort out in time”, say some anti Brexit people. Rules of origin work fine for non EU trade, with a system of self certification of origin available.

http://www.thecommentator.com/article/6614/five_reasons_why_brexit_will_be_fine_without_a_deal


Thursday, 29 June 2017

Why Italy's migrant problem has not led to terrorism

With huge numbers of undocumented migrants from hot spot Muslim countries one might have thought Italy would have a major terrorism problem. It doesn't, and that is because it just does its intelligence, policing, and community management better, and unshackled from political correctness


Migrants-rome-756310
Migrants in Rome, but no connection to terrorism
Timwork
Tim Hedges
On 29 June 2017 06:46
We are all familiar with the tragic pictures of migrants arriving on the shores of Italy’s southern islands. Thousands, of course, have drowned on the passage.
To confound the tragedy the Schengen Agreement has broken down and countries are closing their borders to prevent migrants leaving their first port of call.
Italian welfare groups have been handling huge numbers of displaced folk, many of whom are beginning to rebel against what they see as prison camps. Many try escaping. It is a disaster forever getting worse. But there is one strange aspect to it.
Commentators are now beginning to ask why Italy’s migration issue, concerning almost entirely Muslims and the large majority of them young males, has not produced any terrorist outrage, of the type that has been seen recently in France, Germany and Britain.
Not, at least, at the time of writing. Italy certainly offers some high visibility targets, from the Ghetto to the Vatican in Rome, and the crowded tourist sites in Florence and Venice. So how do the Italians do it?
It may of course be luck, but an investigation conducted by the Espresso Group and Guardian newspapers has turned up some possible reasons.
Italian counter terrorist measures were developed during the Anni di Piombo, the years of lead, which ran from the late ‘60s until the early ‘80s. During this time there were terror outrages from both left and right, and often, such as in the Piazza Fontana bombing in 1969, no one knew which side had done it. The police had to be smart.
The Italian authorities’ technique has been to maintain excellent communication between intelligence and police, such that there is a seamless flow of information. They suggest that in other countries the intelligence services maintain an unhelpful aloofness.
Italy is fortunate that its cities are fairly small. There is no room for, and they actively prevent, any build-up of regional ghettos such as the Paris banlieue or the strictly demarcated sections of Belfast.
Italy also has very few second and third generation immigrants. Until recently it was a country of emigration and few foreigners wanted to come except for tourism. This absence of Italians who might be radicalised means the police can concentrate on foreigners, who can be deported (as 135 have been this year).
From a human rights perspective, Italy deplores the low level blanket surveillance of the populace carried out in the UK and America, but does permit phone taps. These are easily authorised and, unlike in Britain, count as evidence in any subsequent trial.
Part of the policy often involves the breaking up of closely associated, often family groups. In this the Italians have experience from the anti-mafia years. There is an active supergrass programme, offering rewards such as residency.
In particular, the policy involves not holding them in prison, where they quickly radicalise.
But the biggest difference, perhaps, is the openness with which they go about handling suspects. Italy’s counter terrorism chief Franco Gabrielli gives the example of Youssef Zaghba, one of the three attackers on London Bridge.
Zaghba, a Moroccan born Italian, was known to the police in Bologna. Whenever he arrived here the police would see him at the airport and then visit him two or three times a day. They would chat, asking him what he was up to, where he had been.
Zaghba knew he was under surveillance, reducing the need for twenty covert officers on the job. His family knew he was under surveillance, his friends knew it.
The Italian police say they reported to Scotland Yard that he was under open surveillance here and it may be that this was somewhat lost in the translation, Scotland Yard thinking that he wasn’t up to much. In any case they stated that he was not on the British radar.
Who knows whether this system would work in the UK with its huge number of second and third generation Muslims and vast swathes of its smaller cities being purely Muslim areas. The Italian method has the flavour of community policing and perhaps our professionals would laugh at it.
It seems to have worked, though.
http://www.thecommentator.com/article/6613/why_italy_s_migrant_problem_has_not_led_to_terrorism

Wednesday, 28 June 2017

London remains attractive to Malaysian institutional investors

LONDON will continue to attract Malaysian real estate investors and developers including prominent institutional investors such as the Employees Provident Fund (EPF), Lembaga Tabung Haji and Kumpulan Wang Persaraan (Diperbadankan) (KWAP), although these funds have slowed their buying activity slightly with some of them having even disposed of their real estate assets in the city such as EPF’s disposal of One Sheldon Square and 11-12 St James Square office buildings.

28 June 2017
Image result for london images
CBRE international investment director Christopher Pilgrim tells the TheEdgeProperty.com during a recent visit to Malaysia that he expects these funds to continue investing in London as its office market is still showing good returns.
According to CBRE, the rental yields of offices in London range from 3.5% to 4%, higher than the 2% to 3% yields in Singapore, Hong Kong and Paris. The annual average take-up of office spaces in London has been about 13 million sq ft over the past five years.
“The vacancy rate for offices in London is currently hovering at about 4%, which is lower than the 15% average in Malaysia’s Klang Valley. So from an investment point of view, you have very good protection in terms of occupiers and the market being taken up,” he says.
CBRE | WTW managing director Foo Gee Jen concurs. He says the appetite of Malaysian investment funds and real estate investment trusts for overseas properties is still present as they need to diversify their portfolios. In addition, the performance of office spaces in the country is currently relatively weak.
“I believe there will be a dip in the occupancy rate of offices in the Klang Valley this year, primarily due to the incoming supply of about 5 million sq ft bringing the overall net lettable office space to 102 million sq ft, which definitely will put pressure on rents especially of the newly built offices and ageing buildings,” he offers.
Meanwhile, Malaysian property developers are also rather actively looking for new projects or building their schemes in London, thus committing significant capital, notes Pilgrim.
He cites the London City Island developments, Wardian London and Embassy Gardens by Eco World International Bhd and Ballymore Group; the Royal Mint Gardens by IJM Land Bhd; 18 Blackfriars by IGB Corp Bhd; One Crown Place by AlloyMtd Group; Bankside Quarter by Amcorp Properties; and Battersea Power Station by the EPF, Sime Darby Property and S P Setia Bhd.
“We see Malaysian institutional investors, property investors and developers as a major part of the London property market and we think that this will continue to be the case moving forward,” he says, adding that the fundamentals of the London real estate market is still intact despite some risks in the short term.
The short-term risks include the impact from the outcome of the recent general election that took place on June 8, and the ongoing Brexit process.
“Nobody likes instability of any kind. With Article 50 served, the negotiations [between the UK and the European Union] have technically commenced and there is a window of 22 months to conclude that, which is a short period of time. People are hoping for a positive outcome for both sides. It is certainly one of the biggest uncertainties,” he says.
He adds that rents of London commercial property are expected to face some pressure as there will be more supply coming in the next few years.
“In the residential property market, one of the risks is the stamp duty, which the government has made a lot of changes in the past two years. So now if you want to own your second home, you have to pay an additional 3% stamp duty, which is having an impact on the market,” he says.
Quick recovery
Despite recent challenges, the outlook for the London property market is bright as it has recovered from the impact of the Brexit referendum. And the economic fundamentals of the UK have not been affected by the results of the recent general election, which saw a hung parliament as British Prime Minister Theresa May and her Conservative Party had failed to win a parliamentary majority in election.
In response to the general election results, CBRE head of UK research Miles Gibson says: “While the government might look weakened in the light of the result, the overall shape of Brexit isn’t obviously changed by it, nor are the UK’s strong economic fundamentals — which underpin its commercial real estate market”.
There will be inevitable heightened uncertainty while the political landscape stabilises and this may cause the market to be slightly cautious in the very short term. However, he adds that most will “see through” this uncertainty and focus on the fundamentals, implying that the current transactional activity will be largely unaffected.
“The decision to hold the general election comes with the benefit of a two-year extension to the prime minister’s political capital. For trading businesses in the UK, particularly financial services businesses, this extra time will help them plan for the consequences of Brexit.”
This also means that not much other than Brexit will occupy the ministers’ minds for some time, implying a welcome stability on real estate policy.
Meanwhile, Pilgrim notes that market sentiment has been cautious due to the Brexit referendum last year, but in the last two quarters, the market has returned to normal as evidenced by the record-high capital inflow in the office property market and the strong take-up for residential property developments.
“From a commercial point of view, we are actually seeing more entries of global capital coming into London. The market recovery was much faster than we expected,” he says.
According to data from CBRE, total investments into the London office sector stood at £4.891 billion (RM27.02 billion) in the first quarter of 2017 (1Q2017), the most active first quarter on record and the highest quarterly total since 4Q2014.
A total of 13 transactions of more than £100 million were transacted in 1Q2017 compared with 11 in 4Q2016. Overseas investors, including Malaysian, Singaporean, Chinese, European, American and Middle Easterner once again dominated the market in 1Q2017, accounting for 80% of all transactions by volume, up from 74% in the previous quarter.
“While Brexit is very much an issue in the UK, I think it has become less of an issue for the global investor,” he says.
The residential property market has seen stronger take-up in the past four months, attributable to the weaker British currency against the US dollar, the strong domestic demand, the lowest unemployment rate of 4.6% since July of 1975 and the recovery in consumer sentiment thanks to less uncertainties in the market, he notes.
“The CBRE residential team has seen an increase of 50% in sales since last year, so we actually see the market picking up quite quickly. You have to look at the entire UK housing market and the London market as two separate markets. If there is any slowdown across the wider UK, it is not necessarily what we will see in London,” he says.
Lower entry level for individual investors
Besides institutional investors, London also offers opportunities for individual investors to tap on the capital appreciation of residential property, he offers.
“Over the last couple of years, many Malaysian retail investors have been going into the London residential property market to tap on the vast infrastructure projects undergoing in the city,” he notes, citing Zone 3 and Zone 4 of London which have become popular among investors, thanks to the upcoming Elizabeth railway line.
Formerly known as Crossrail line, the Elizabeth line will run over 100km from Reading and Heathrow in the west, through new tunnels under central London to Shenfield and Abbey Wood in the east. There will be 40 stations — 10 new and 30 upgraded when fully completed in 2019.
The first phase from Liverpool Street to Shenfield has started operations in May this year. The second phase, which covers the central section, will open in late 2018, while a full service from Reading and Heathrow in the west will start the following year.
The houses in the zones are expected to register decent growth in value when the railway project is fully completed in 2019, he says, adding that the average capital appreciation of houses in London ranges from 3% to 5%.
“The entry level of these houses are quite low at between £600 psf and £800 psf. It will only cost up to £400,000 for a small studio unit of about 500 sq ft, thus offering a low entry level for investors,” he says, adding that investing in London is also a good “currency play” for Malaysian investors, given the weakened ringgit.
Pilgrim points out that houses below £1,000 psf are performing very well, as buyers are hunting for more affordable products.
“Historically, buyers were looking at prices of £1,000, £1,500 or £2,000 psf, but now I think there has been some shift as there is now a stronger demand for properties below £1,000 psf,” he says.
This story first appeared in TheEdgeProperty.com pullout on June 23, 2017. Download TheEdgeProperty.com pullout here for free.
http://www.theedgemarkets.com/article/london-remains-attractive-malaysian-institutional-investors

Enough talk about a transitional deal with the EU

A transitional arrangement could easily end up meaning another five years until Brexit means Brexit. That could mean Brexit doesn't happen at all. The talk of a transitional arrangement needs to stop. Let's just get Britain out, and stop the dithering

European_commission
No transition with the European Commission
Picture
Alexander Fluza
On 28 June 2017 10:10
It recently emerged Brexit Secretary David Davis and Chancellor, Philip Hammond have been having weekly meetings, in which -- among other things -- they have agreed on pursuing a so-called ‘transitional deal’.
This would mean staying in the Single Market, unable to control our borders, and quite possibly unable to control our laws and trade policy – things we we voted for in the EU Referendum -- for an extra two or more years, possibly kicking Brexit even further down the road and into the long grass.
It’s a dangerous route to go down, and smacks of some politicians still trying to water down, or even halt Brexit.
We have already waited almost a year for Article 50 to be triggered, and some politicians are now proposing we wait for up to 5 years for the Brexit negotiations to be completed.
They are talking about transitional arrangements which could extend this into at least a 5-year wait until Brexit means Brexit. Worse still, while promises of a set exit date may be given, we all know how reliable the EU is about its promises.
Any such transitional deal could well be extended over and over again, while our politicians’ resolve is ground down, railroading us into a soft, or even, a fake Brexit.
Proponents argue business needs time to adapt. If we are to have a deal, it will have to have been reached well before two years are up, so the EU has time to approve it, which will in itself take months.
By the end of 2019, business would already have had plenty of time to understand Brexit would be happening -- and months of knowing the exact details. In our modern economy, businesses must move fast. The time they are given to adapt will be ample. With plenty of notice given, it would hardly be a cliff-edge -- more a gentle hillock. The media and the Remainers should stop using such emotive language.
Not only would a transitional arrangement be unnecessary, it would be a slap in the face for Brexiteers whose patience has already been stretched thin.
This red herring could even damage negotiations. This would be seen as the UK asking the EU for a favour, wasting valuable negotiating time. Trying to call in such a ‘favour’ would make us seem weak -- to the world and to the EU -- as if we are not prepared for what our aim is, to Get Britain Out of the EU. This would be of no benefit to a global Brexit Britain.
http://www.thecommentator.com/article/6612/enough_talk_about_a_transitional_deal_with_the_eu