Sunday 26 June 2016

Defeatist talk will cost Britain dear

Project Fear has not gone away. There is a tangible sense that some of those who were on the losing side in the EU referendum are almost willing a calamity in order to damn those who voted for Brexit. The outcome exposed a deep fissure running through British society that now risks being widened by the manner of the response.

TELEGRAPH VIEW

26 JUNE 2016 • 10:39PM

Union flag banners hang across a street near the Houses of Parliament in central London on June 25, 2016, after the announcement that the UK had voted on June 23 to leave the European Union


Project Fear has not gone away. There is a tangible sense that some of those who were on the losing side in the EU referendum are almost willing a calamity in order to damn those who voted for Brexit. The outcome exposed a deep fissure running through British society that now risks being widened by the manner of the response.

It is apparent that many Remainers regard Leavers as reckless at best and xenophobic bigots at worst. Anyone who hoped this exercise in popular democracy would settle the EU issue without rancour has been disappointed.

"We who are part of this narrow majority must do everything we can to reassure the Remainers." Boris Johnson

Ironically, David Cameron hoped the referendum would end Conservative divisions once and for all. Instead, it has triggered turmoil inside the two major parties. Mr Cameron’s decision to step down as Prime Minister has opened up the contest for his successor.

In the Labour Party, meanwhile, nearly half the shadow cabinet has resigned in protest at Jeremy Corbyn’s stewardship. He seems certain to lose a vote of no confidence by MPs yet he is determined to stay on, claiming a mandate from the largely Left-wing membership. Even if Mr Corbyn is challenged – and no alternative candidate has yet emerged – he is likely to stand again and win, yet have no authority where it matters, in the House of Commons.

These are uncertain times. The referendum has consequences for Britain that will be hard to manage if there is political upheaval. There can be no great surprise that people feel uneasy, even fearful, given the apocalyptic warnings of economic catastrophe issued during the campaign.

But it is now incumbent upon everyone concerned for the country’s future to abandon the doom-mongering. Mr Cameron and George Osborne must now publicly disavow Project Fear and speak up for Britain’s economy. Once the dust has settled, there is a great potential Brexit dividend that needs to be grasped. Of course, it won’t be easy to unravel a 43-year relationship with Europe; but there will be opportunities, not just for the UK but for Europe as well if its leaders draw the right conclusions from what has happened. If they think it has exposed divisions only in Britain then they are not paying attention to what is going on in their own countries.

There is no earthly reason why a country severing a political relationship that was already pretty half-hearted should not flourish unless we talk ourselves into a crisis or one is foisted upon us.

The functionaries of Brussels want to expedite the British exit but their hand has been stayed by elected leaders like Angela Merkel who appreciate the dangers to the whole EU project of taking precipitate action. Germany’s finance minister Wolfgang Schauble has raised the prospect of a new associate status for non-eurozone countries that might meet Britain’s desire for greater independence without breaking up the institution.

It is in Britain’s interest to take this slowly by not invoking Article 50 to withdraw until informal talks have taken place to prepare the ground. But it is in Europe’s interest, too. While the Commission may rejoice that their most recalcitrant member has decided to leave, it cannot possibly be to the advantage of the member states to engineer an acrimonious divorce.

Indeed, if wiser heads prevail then the future relationship between the EU and the UK can develop in a mutually beneficial way. That needs to be the aim now, not more recrimination and unnecessary alarmism.

There are many political uncertainties to negotiate. The country voted against something without being able to say what it wanted in its place. That is now a matter for Parliament, where there is a pro-EU majority among MPs. While they must fulfil the wishes of the people to leave the EU, how it is done will be a source of huge controversy. Philip Hammond, the Foreign Secretary, said continued access to the single market must be the primary objective of negotiations, with a “trade-off” that means accepting limits on the UK’s ability to control immigration from the remaining 27 states. But some in the Brexit camp will argue that this runs counter to the country’s wishes implied, if not expressed, in the referendum result.

Another major issue will be the future of the United Kingdom itself.Nicola Sturgeon, the SNP leader, signalled that Scotland could veto the UK exit because the Scottish parliament has to agree a Legislative Consent Motion allowing Westminster to pass laws that have an impact on devolved matters, as a Brexit clearly would.

The constitutional implications of last Thursday’s political earthquake, therefore, remain unclear and may require a general election to address. But, in the meantime, there must be an end to defeatism. As Franklin D Roosevelt said, the only thing we have to fear is fear itself.


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/2016/06/26/defeatist-talk-will-cost-britain-dear/

Brexit | How world leaders and politicians reacted

  • Barack Obama

    US President
    “The people of the United Kingdom have spoken, and we respect their decision. The special relationship between the United States and the United Kingdom is enduring, and the United Kingdom’s membership in NATO remains a vital cornerstone of U.S. foreign, security, and economic policy.”
  • Donald Trump

    Republican nominee for US President
  • Hillary Clinton

    Democratic nominee for US President
  • Angela Merkel

    Chancellor of Germany
    Merkel said member states should “calmly and prudently analyse and evaluate the situation, before making the right decisions together.
    “We take note of the British people’s decision with regret. There is no doubt that this is a blow to Europe and to the European unification process.”
  • Vladimir Putin

    President of Russia
    Mr Putin said Brexit would have both “positive and negative” consequences for Russia and the rest of the world, but that he expected markets to stabilise from the initial shock. “Life will show us whether there are more plusses or minuses,” he said.
  • Enda Kenny

    Irish Taoiseach
  • Francois Hollande

    President of France

    “The British people have voted by referendum to leave the European Union. It’s painful choice and I deeply regret it for the UK and for Europe, but the choice is theirs and we must respect it.”
  • Malcolm Turnbull

    Australian Prime Minister

    “We respect the decision of the British people and we know that we will continue to have in the future the very closest relations with the United Kingdom. On a personal level I am sorry to see David resign.”
  • Marine Le Pen

    France's Front National leader
    Le Pen praised the British decision,saying: “freedom has won”.
  • Lars Lokke Rasmussen

    Danish Prime Minister
    “We must respect the choice that a majority of the British people have made. At the same time, I won’t hide the fact that I think it is a very sad result for Europe and for Denmark.”
  • Andrzej Duda

    Polish President
    “Britain is a great European country and historically has been our ally. I believe the referendum result will not change this.”